The Goslings: A Study of the American SchoolsSinclair, Upton
History
The Goslings: A Study of the American Schools
Sinclair, Upton
Education -- United States
Sometimes these children would be pained to note that teachers of a
liberal bent of mind would make some statement, and then be seized with
fear, and apologize and explain that they didn’t really mean it. One
teacher explained that she was using a very reactionary text-book,
because she had to. “And,” added the child, “that teacher is not
teaching any more.” The child understood exactly why, having often
observed the principal standing behind a half-opened door, listening to
what was going on in the class!
The Socialist children brought me their text-books, to show what they
had to endure. For example, that work on English literature written by
the principal of the Northern High School of Detroit, Edwin L. Miller.
This local celebrity tells the children of his city that George Bernard
Shaw “persistently obtrudes upon the public the absurd proposition that
all property should be held in common.” I hereby publicly offer to Mr.
Miller or his publishers, the Lippincotts, the entire income which I may
derive from this book if they will point out to me a single passage from
the writings of George Bernard Shaw in which this proposition is
advanced. Will Mr. Miller or his publishers let me hear from them? They
will not!
Also “The Elements of Political Economy,” by Professor J. Laurence
Laughlin, prize reactionary of the University of Standard Oil. This
eminent economist tells the school children of Detroit that “Socialistic
teaching strikes at the root of individuality and independent
character.” I have known some thousands of Socialists in my lifetime,
and I venture the estimate that nine out of ten of them possess more
individuality and independent character than a kept college professor of
the Rockefellers. This professor is so rabid in defense of his masters
that he even finds it necessary to underscore the phrases in his
text-books: “The great _difficulty with these schemes_,” etc. He reveals
himself so ignorant of Socialism that he cannot even spell correctly the
names of its leaders; he gives three names, Proudhon, Karl Marx, and
Lassalle, and misspells two of them!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account