2. How the disciples knew the man had been *born blind*, we are not told.
To excite greater compassion, and probably to obtain alms, he may have
been himself proclaiming the fact. It was reasonable enough that the
disciples should think of the sins of the man’s parents as the reason why
he was born blind, for God Himself tells us that He is “jealous, visiting
the iniquities of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth
generation” (Exod. xx. 5). And we know that David was punished by the
death of his child (2 Kings xii. 14). But why should the disciples imagine
that the man might have been born blind on account of _his own_ sins? Some
think that the disciples may have been imbued with the false notions of
the Jews regarding the transmigration of souls, and have thought that this
man’s soul had sinned in some previous state of existence, and been
therefore imprisoned in a blind body. But it is unlikely that the
disciples at this time, the third year of our Lord’s public life, were
still in such ignorance.(70) Others think that the question means: was he
born blind for some sin which it _was foreseen_ he would commit? Others
think that the question was hastily put without advertence to its
absurdity. Others that the meaning is: was it for his own, or, _since that
is out of the question_, was it for the sin of his parents that this man
was born blind?
3. Respondit Iesus: Neque hic 3. Jesus answered: Neither
peccavit, neque parentes eius: hath this man sinned, nor his
sed ut manifestentur opera Dei parents; but that the works of
in illo. God should be made manifest in
him.
3. Christ replies that neither the man himself nor his parents had sinned,
so as to explain his blindness—ἵνα, as a _cause_ why he should be born
blind; but his blindness was ordained, or at least permitted, for the sake
of the miracle which Christ was now about to work.
4. Me oportet operari opera 4. I must work the works of
eius qui misit me, donec dies him that sent me, whilst it is
est: venit nox, quando nemo day: the night cometh when no
potest operari. man can work.
4. *Day* is here the span of Christ’s mortal life: *night* the time after
death, when Christ was no longer to perform works visibly before men. Of
course, as God, Christ still works, “sustaining all things by the word of
His power” (Heb. i. 3), but of this Divine operation there is no question
here.
5. Quamdiu sum in mundo, lux 5. As long as I am in the
sum mundi. world, I am the light of the
world.
5. *The light.* See i. 4, 5. Christ was the spiritual light, and as a
symbol and proof of His office of spiritual light‐giver, He was now about
to open the eyes of the blind man to the light of day.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account