*Judas Iscariot* (Gr. Judas Iscariot, _son of Simon_: see notes on vi. 72)
spoke out, asking why this ointment was not sold at 300 pence, and the
price given to the poor? We discussed above on vi. 7, the value of the
Roman silver penny at this time current in Palestine, from which it
appears that this box of ointment was thought to be worth nearly £10 of
our money.
6. Dixit autem hoc, non quia 6. Now he said this, not
de egenis pertinebat ad eum, because he cared for the poor;
sed quia fur erat, et loculos but because he was a thief,
habens, ea quae mittebantur and having the purse, carried
portabat. the things that were put
therein.
6. St. John here declares the motive of Judas. It was not love for the
poor, as he pretended, but because, being purse‐bearer, for our Lord and
the disciples, he was always anxious to receive money, that he might have
an opportunity of filching some of it for himself. Whether with our
Rhemish Version we give ἐβάσταζεν the meaning of “carried,” or, as others
prefer, “made away with,” at all events, it is plain from the verse, in
which Judas is declared a thief, that he sometimes appropriated to his own
uses money from the common purse. In his case, too, the saying was true:
“Nemo repente fit turpissimus.”
7. Dixit ergo Iesus: Sinite 7. Jesus therefore said: Let
illam ut in diem sepulturae her alone, that she may keep
meae servet illud. it against the day of my
burial.
7. There is a difference of reading in this verse. Many ancient
authorities read: *She has kept it* (τετήρηκεν) *against the day of my
burial*; and the meaning of this reading is plain. The more probable(80)
Greek reading, however, is: “_That she might keep it_ (ἱνα ... τηρήσῃ)
_against the day of My burial_.” In this reading we take our Lord’s reply
to mean: Let her alone: it was not sold (Judas had asked: Why was it not
sold?) in order that she might keep it against the day of My burial. Thus
we would read “servaret” instead of “servet” in the Vulgate; and we take
“ut” to depend not on “sinite,” but on some words such as “non veniit” (it
was not sold) understood. St. John’s report of Christ’s words agrees
substantially with that of St. Mark, who represents our Lord as saying:
“She is come beforehand to anoint My body for the burial” (Mark xiv. 8);
and both accounts, as well as that of St. Matt. (xxvi. 12), “She hath done
it for My burial,” signify that our Lord’s death was so close at hand that
this unction might be regarded as a preparation for His burial; and hence
Mary was not to be blamed, inasmuch as such honours were usually paid to
bodies before burial.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account