22. Dicit ei Iudas, non ille 22. Judas saith to him, not
Iscariotes: Domine, quid the Iscariot: Lord, how is it,
factum est quia manifestaturus that thou wilt manifest
es nobis teipsum, et non thyself to us, and not to the
mundo? world?
23. Respondit Iesus, et dixit 23. Jesus answered, and said
ei: Si quis diligit me, to him: If any one love me, he
sermonem meum servabit, et will keep my word, and my
Pater meus diliget eum, et ad Father will love him, and we
eum veniemus, et mansionem will come to him, and will
apud eum faciemus: make our abode with him.
22‐23. Asked by the Apostle Jude, brother to James the Less, who was also
called Thaddeus, how He would manifest Himself to the Apostles, yet be
unseen by the world, Christ replies that He will come and dwell in all
that love Him, and thus manifest Himself, and be seen by them in a
spiritual manner.
24. Qui non diligit me, 24. He that loveth me not,
sermones meos non servat. Et keepeth not my words. And the
sermonem quem audistis, non word which you have heard is
est meus: sed ejus qui misit not mine; but the Father’s who
me, Patris. sent me.
24. He had just said that those who love Him will keep His words and obey
them, and now He adds that those who do not love Him will not keep His
words. The reason why He here insists upon this observance of His words
is, that such observance is necessary, before He will manifest Himself and
make His abode in any heart. For, as is clear from verse 21, Christ will
manifest Himself only to those who are loved by the Father; but they alone
are loved by the Father who love Christ, and they alone love Christ who
keep His commandments (verse 23).
*And the word which you have heard*, &c. “Sermonem” (Vulg.) ought to be
“sermo,” and the verb in the original is in the present (ἀκούετε). The
sense, therefore, is: the words which you are _wont to hear_ from Me are
not Mine alone, but the Father’s also who sent Me. *Is not mine, but the
Father’s who sent me.* This form of expression, which seems to declare
that the words are in no way Christ’s, is a Hebraism, and means that they
are not His alone. See above on vii. 16. Of course the authority of
Christ’s words was equal in every way to that of the Father’s, but since
the Apostles did not yet fully realize His Divinity with all that it
implied, He invokes the Father’s authority as having more weight with
them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account