10. *Speakest thou not to me?* In the original the pronoun, standing at
the head of the clause, is emphatic. Speakest thou not _to me_, the
representative of Roman power, who have authority (ἐξουσίαν) to liberate
or crucify thee?
*Knowest thou not that I have power*, &c. The more probable order of the
clauses is: “I have power to release thee, and I have power to crucify
thee,” the motive of hope standing before that of fear.
11. Respondit Iesus: Non 11. Jesus answered: Thou
haberes potestatem adversum me shouldest not have any power
ullam, nisi tibi datum esset against me, unless it were
desuper. Propterea qui me given thee from above.
tradidit tibi, maius peccatum Therefore he that hath
habet. delivered me to thee, hath the
greater sin.
11. Pilate’s claim to unlimited power over Him makes Jesus again break
silence. His words are an implicit admission that Pilate possesses power
over Him, but at the same time a reminder that there was One greater than
even a Roman governor, without whose permission Pilate could do nothing
against Him.
*Unless it were given thee from above.* From the original, in which we
have ἦν δεδομένον, not ἦν δεδομένη (datum, not data), it is clear that the
verb has not “power” for its subject, but is to be taken impersonally:
Unless it were given thee from above _to have such power_.
“From above” has been taken by some to refer to the Sanhedrim, as if
Christ here referred to it as a higher tribunal than Pilate’s; but this
view cannot be admitted. Not only is it opposed to the ordinary sense of
ἄνωθεν (iii. 31; James i. 17; iii. 15, 17), but it would make our Lord say
that Pilate had received his power from the Sanhedrim—a statement which
would not be correct. “From above”, then, means: from heaven or from God.
*Therefore he that hath delivered* (παραδούς, not παραδιδούς) *me to thee
hath the greater sin*. Some, as Kuinoel, hold that διὰ τοῦτο is here
merely a formula of transition (like the Hebrew לבן, Judg. viii. 7, &c.),
of which no account is to be taken. The meaning is then sufficiently
clear. But if, as most commentators take for granted, we are to give διὰ
τοῦτο its ordinary inferential force, the connection is very obscure, and
has been variously explained.
(_a_) Some thus: Because you exercise your power _unwillingly_ therefore
your sin is less than that of Caiphas and the Sanhedrim, who have
delivered me to you, and are forcing you to condemn me. But it is rightly
objected against this interpretation, that the word “unwillingly,” upon
which it turns, is neither expressed nor suggested in the text.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account