47‐49. Nathanael must have felt convinced that he had been hidden from
Christ’s natural view, otherwise he could not draw the inference which,
aided by divine grace, he draws. Whether Nathanael yet recognised Jesus to
be true God, and professed his belief in Him as such, in the words of
verse 49, is disputed. If we are to judge from his words (ὁ υἱός), the
affirmative opinion seems much more probable. The words are an echo of the
Baptist’s testimony (v. 34), but Nathanael confesses not alone Christ’s
Divine origin, but also His human sovereignty: Thou art the Son of God,
Thou art the King of Israel.
50. Respondit Iesus, et dixit 50. Jesus answered and said to
ei: Quia dixi tibi: Vidi te him: Because I said unto thee,
sub ficu, credis: maius his I saw thee under the fig‐tree,
videbis. thou believest: greater things
than these shalt thou see.
50. Jesus promises Nathanael stronger arguments in proof of His Divinity.
In the words: *Greater things than these shalt thou see*, the plural these
seems to point to the class and not merely the special incident.
51. Et dicit ei: Amen, amen. 51. And he saith to him: Amen,
dico vobis, videbitis coelum amen, I say to you, you shall
apertum, et Angelos Dei see the heaven opened, and the
ascendentes, et descendentes Angels of God ascending and
supra Filium hominis. descending upon the son of
man.
51. *Amen, amen*, is peculiar to John. The other Evangelists use “Amen”
only once in such asseverations. “Amen means verily (at the end of a
prayer, so be it); and when doubled, strengthens the asseveration, and
points to the solemnity of the declaration about to follow” (M’Ev.).
*Son of man.* This term, probably derived in its Messianic sense from Dan.
vii. 13, 14, was very rarely applied to Christ, except by Himself, and we
find Him using it very frequently (though not exclusively; see, _e.g._,
Matt. ix. 6; xxiii. 30; Acts vii. 56) in connection with His privations,
sufferings, and death (Matt. viii. 20; xii.40; xvii. 12; xxvi. 21‐25; John
iii. 14, &c.). It indicates that Christ was not only man like Adam; but
that, unlike him, He was _descended_ of man, and therefore our brother in
the truest sense.
*You shall see.* Though Nathanael is addressed (and He saith to _him_),
yet the plural (videbitis) shows that the wondrous sign here promised was
to be seen not by him alone, but at least by Philip also, and probably by
others. The meaning of the prediction is obscure. Evidently some great
sign is promised; but what it is, interpreters are far from agreed. Some
take the words metaphorically, others literally.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account