The Gospel of the HereafterSmyth, J. Paterson (John Paterson)
Religion
The Gospel of the Hereafter
Smyth, J. Paterson (John Paterson)
Eschatology
And this brings me to point out WHAT SORT OF KNOWLEDGE WE CAN HAVE AND
WHAT SORT OF KNOWLEDGE WE CANNOT HAVE about that life. It may help you
not to expect the impossible.
You desire to know two things about the Unseen World.
1st. You desire to know the real life of the "I"
himself--consciousness, thought, memory, love, happiness, penitence and
such like.
2nd. You desire to know his outward surrounding, so that you can
picture to yourself his life in that world. That is what gives the
interesting touch to your knowledge of your friend's life in a foreign
land on earth.
Now the first of these is the really important knowledge, and such
knowledge you can have and you can understand because it is of the same
kind as the knowledge you already have of him on earth.
The second would be an interesting knowledge, but this knowledge you
cannot have, because you have no faculties for it and no similar
experience to help you to realize it. It is a law of all human
knowledge that you cannot know and cannot depict to yourself anything
of which you have had no corresponding experience before.
"I," "myself" which goes into the Unseen is the really important
matter, not my surroundings. And the essential knowledge, I say, about
that self, about his inner real life in the Unseen you can have and you
can understand because the inner life there is of the very same kind as
the inner life here. If I am told of full consciousness there, of
memory there, of love or hatred there, of happiness or pain there, of
joy or sorrow there, I can easily understand it. I have had experience
of the like here. There is no difficulty.
But the knowledge of the outward environment there--what we shall be
like, how that world will appear, how we shall live and move and have
our being in a spiritual existence--all that deeply interesting
knowledge which imagination could use to picture that life and bring it
before us--THAT we cannot have. It is not possible with our limited
faculties and limited experience. We could not be taught it. We have
no faculties to take it in and no experience to aid us in realizing it.
A blind man cannot picture colours to himself, a deaf man cannot
imagine music. It is not that we are unwilling to teach him, but that
his limited faculties prevent him from taking in the idea.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account