The Gospel of the HereafterSmyth, J. Paterson (John Paterson)
Religion
The Gospel of the Hereafter
Smyth, J. Paterson (John Paterson)
Eschatology
It takes perhaps a child's or a woman's heart to realize the horror of
that thought. I remember as a child reading a Sunday-school book that
helped me to realize the meaning of this "for ever and ever in hell."
I was to imagine a huge forest, and a tiny insect coming from the
farthest planet and biting an atom out of one of the leaves, and
carrying it away to his home, the journey taking one thousand years.
Then I was to imagine the ages that must elapse before that whole leaf
was carried off. Then the stupendous time before the whole tree would
be gone. Then, as my brain reeled at the thought, I was to look
forward to the carrying away of the whole forest, and from that to the
carrying away of the whole world. Then came the awful sentence in
italics, _Even then eternity would but have begun_. I suppose God will
forgive the people who wrote that book for children if they repent, but
I don't feel much like forgiving them. I can remember still lying
awake in the night and crying as I thought of the lost souls in Hell as
my poor little brain reeled at the thought of the journeys of that
wretched insect and of those whom God kept alive to suffer for ever and
ever and ever.
Then as one grew older came the further horror that these "lost" are
kept alive not only to suffer but to sin everlastingly. They are to go
on increasing in sin for ever and ever and ever in the universe of the
All-holy God. One tests this by the ruling thoughts of Scripture. One
thinks of God's holiness. One thinks of the golden thread of hope.
One wonders what it means that Christ came to "destroy the works of the
devil"[1] and to destroy the devil (bruise the serpent's head[2]) and
how one day "God shall be all in all" if straight opposite for all
eternity shall be Satan's Kingdom of misery and sin. Surely Christ has
not failed! And yet--and yet--what shall we say? And what shall we
say of God's fatherhood? Shall we say as some do that as Judge He must
do cruel things which as Father He would shrink from? God forbid! The
Judge and the Father are one. Men would never use such sophistry about
the character of God if it were put into plain words. "Ye must ken,"
said a godly old Scotchman, "that the Almighty may often have to do in
His offeeshial capacity what He would scorn to do as a private
individual!" I quote this not with flippancy but with stern
indignation. That is baldly what such sophistry means.
Clearly one who insists on this doctrine ought at least to be
absolutely certain that Scripture leaves him no escape from it. Now
the conclusion which a thorough study of the question leads to is
this;--that Scripture nowhere definitely affirms that the sufferings of
the lost _shall not be_ everlasting, and nowhere definitely affirms
that they _shall be_ everlasting.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account