The Gospel of the HereafterSmyth, J. Paterson (John Paterson)
Religion
The Gospel of the Hereafter
Smyth, J. Paterson (John Paterson)
Eschatology
Even that if it be true is some relief. We should no longer be forced
to believe of God what Conscience declares to be unworthy of Him. But
is it true? I can already see the Bible turned over for the dark array
of texts beginning with "He that believeth not shall be damned," "How
can ye escape the damnation of Hell?" "These shall go away into
everlasting punishment," etc.
Let me explain.
If we examine the Bible carefully we shall find that, while there are a
great many clear proofs of the certainty and awfulness of Hell, the
proofs of this theory of Everlasting Torment are not much to be
depended on. Practically they can all be gathered into three groups.
In the first the chief word is DAMN or DAMNATION.
In the second the chief word is HELL.
In the third the chief word is EVERLASTING.
It is not too much to say that if these three sets of passages were
removed from the Bible nobody would think of believing in everlasting
torment. Now let me make the assertion straight out--There is no word
in the original language of the Bible that at all justifies the use of
either of these words in the meaning that we have attached to it--and
therefore the Revised Version of the Bible has practically swept them
all away.
§ 1
Take first the words Damn, Damnation which convey to us the idea of
doom to a Hell of never-ending torment and never-ending sin. The
original word conveyed no such idea to our Lord or the Apostles. It
conveyed no such idea to the translators of the Authorized Version.
When they translated it Damn and Damnation they did not at all mean
what we now mean.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account