The Government of England (Vol. I)Lowell, A. Lawrence (Abbott Lawrence)
History
The Government of England (Vol. I)
Lowell, A. Lawrence (Abbott Lawrence)
Great Britain -- Politics and government
Ever since 1688, when James II., fleeing in fear of his life, "withdrew
himself out of the kingdom, and thereby abdicated," the title to the
Crown has been based entirely upon parliamentary enactment. At the
present day it rests upon the Act of Settlement of 1700,[16:1] which
provided that, in default of heirs of William and of Anne, the Crown
should pass to the Electress Sophia, and the heirs of her body, being
Protestants. Sophia was the granddaughter of James I., through her
mother, wife of the Elector Palatine; and while not his nearest heir,
was the nearest who was a Protestant.
[Sidenote: The Rules of Succession.]
The rules of descent are in the main the same as those for the
inheritance of land at Common Law.[17:1] That is, the title passes to
the eldest son; or, if he is not living, through him to his issue, male
or female, as if he had himself died upon the throne. If the first son
has died without issue, then to, or through, the eldest son who is
living, or has issue living; and in default of any sons living, or
leaving issue, then to, or through, the eldest daughter. The rule is,
however, subject to the qualification that any one who is, or becomes, a
Catholic is excluded from, and forfeits, the right to the Crown, which
then passes to the next heir. In order to insure a test that will make
this last provision effective, the sovereign is obliged to take an oath,
abjuring the Catholic religion, in words which have proved offensive to
members of that faith. After the accession of Edward VII., therefore,
but before his coronation, an effort was made to modify the form of the
oath, and a bill was introduced into the House of Lords for that
purpose; but it was not then found possible to arrange a phrase
satisfactory to all parties, and the bill was dropped.
[Sidenote: Incapacity of the Sovereign.]
In other monarchies permanent provision has been made by law for the
possible incapacity of the monarch, whether by reason of infancy or
insanity. But this has never been done in England. Each case has been
dealt with as it arose, and usually after it has arisen, so that, in
default of any person competent to give the royal assent to bills,
Parliament has been driven into the legal absurdity of first passing a
regency bill to confer such a power upon a regent, and then directing
the Chancellor to affix the Great Seal to a commission for giving assent
to that bill. Until recent times it was also thought necessary to
appoint officers, Lords Justices or others, to exercise the royal
powers when the sovereign went out of the kingdom; but with the rapidity
of modern travel and communication this has become unnecessary, and it
has not been done since the accession of Queen Victoria.
[Sidenote: The Powers of the Crown.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account