The Government of England (Vol. I)Lowell, A. Lawrence (Abbott Lawrence)
History
The Government of England (Vol. I)
Lowell, A. Lawrence (Abbott Lawrence)
Great Britain -- Politics and government
The only other officers of the House that need be mentioned here are the
Sergeant-at-Arms, who acts as the executive officer and chief of police
of the House under the direction of the Speaker; the Clerk of the House;
and the Counsel to Mr. Speaker, who is a legal adviser, and has
important duties in connection with private bill legislation. It is a
curious survival that the Sergeant-at-Arms,[263:3] and the Clerk of the
House with his chief assistants,[263:4] are appointed by the Crown, and
hold office permanently. Their work is, of course, of a non-partisan
character, and they do not always belong to the party of the ministry
that appoints them. Sir Courtenay Ilbert, for example, the present Clerk
of the House, although a Liberal, was appointed by the Conservative
government, and not by way of promotion in the service of the House, for
he was at the time Parliamentary Counsel to the Treasury.
FOOTNOTES:
[251:1] The question where the Peelites should sit in 1852 was much
discussed among themselves. Morley, "Life of Gladstone," I., 422-23.
[253:1] Standing Orders 28-29, Com. Papers, 1905, LXII., 159. Under the
new rule adopted in 1906 the Speaker orders the lobby to be cleared, and
the members begin to pass through it at once.
[253:2] To refuse to do so has been treated as such a disregard of the
authority of the chair as will justify suspending the member. May,
"Parl. Practice," 10 Ed., 338.
On March 5, 1901, twelve Irish Nationalists, who refused to go into the
lobby because they had had no chance to speak when the closure was moved
on a vote on account, were suspended; Hans. 4 Ser. XC., 692-96; and on
Aug. 5, 1904, the Welsh members refused to vote as a protest against the
use of closure on the Education (Local Authorities Defaults) Bill. After
they had persisted so far that the Chairman reported the matter to the
House, they consented to withdraw altogether, and no further steps were
taken against them. Hans. 4 Ser. CXXXIX., 1259-68.
[254:1] S.O. 30.
[255:1] The standing orders relating to private business are much more
elaborate and come far nearer to a code of procedure.
[255:2] This had not been the practice earlier; but the discussion of
changes in the standing orders has sometimes been very long. In 1882 the
new rules, which dealt with closure, the suspension of disorderly
members and the creation of standing committees, were debated for
thirty-three days. On the other hand, a change was made in 1901 on the
motion of a private member, at a single sitting. Hans. 4 Ser. XCII.,
555-75. In 1906 the changes were referred to a select committee and then
each of them adopted on a motion by the government. Hans. 4 Ser. CLV.,
197 _et seq._
[256:1] May, 145.
[256:2] _Ibid._, 145.
[256:3] S.O. 15.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account