The government of the Ottoman Empire in the time of Suleiman the MagnificentLybyer, Albert Howe
History
The government of the Ottoman Empire in the time of Suleiman the Magnificent
Lybyer, Albert Howe
Süleyman I, Sultan of the Turks, 1494 or 1495-1566; Turkey -- Politics and government
Since the passing of those prehistoric times when all human ideas were
solidified together into a single “crust of custom,” every nation
has probably had two leading institutions, more or less closely
connected,—the one of religion and the other of government. The foregoing
pages have shown how powerful and pervasive were the Ottoman Ruling
Institution and the Moslem Institution in the Ottoman Empire. In the
parallel organizations of the empire of the Moguls, however, it is
not possible to discern comparable unique individuality, systematic
structure, and ordered efficiency. Some allowance must be made for a
comparative lack of information, since not many Western observers have
described the more distant empire; but this fact can hardly alter the
conclusion materially. The institutional structure of the Mogul Empire
was decidedly inferior to that of the Ottoman Empire in solidity, system,
and persistent energy.
THE PERSONNEL OF THE MOGUL GOVERNMENT
Baber’s following consisted of the comrades of his many years of
fighting, an army of cavalry, artillery, and musketry composed in
ancient Turkish fashion of high-spirited men attached to their chief by
impressive leadership and open-handed generosity. Courage, military
prowess, and the nominal profession of Islam were the necessary
qualifications; differences of race, education, and Moslem doctrine
were disregarded. Warriors of Turki stock, Persians of Shiite leanings,
hardy Afghans, “Roman” artillery engineers from Stambul, were equals in
the rough brotherhood of Baber’s camp. The principle of subordination,
at least among persons of consequence, was not that of slaves to their
master, but of tribesmen to their chief, of vassals to their honored
suzerain.
When Turks had first invaded India, five centuries before, slavery as
a means of recruiting and training soldiers and governors was in full
swing. Mahmûd of Ghazni was the son of a father who had risen through
slavery. The thirteenth century saw enthroned at Delhi a dynasty of slave
kings which antedated by several decades the Mamelukes of Egypt. Late in
the fourteenth century Firoz III owned 180,000 slaves, of whom 40,000
constituted his household. The Mameluke government endured for more
than two and a half centuries, until overthrown by the more centralized
and efficient slave system of the Ottomans; but in Central Asia and
ultimately in India a new force speedily rendered the slave method, save
for some survivals, antiquated and impossible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account