The government of the Ottoman Empire in the time of Suleiman the MagnificentLybyer, Albert Howe
History
The government of the Ottoman Empire in the time of Suleiman the Magnificent
Lybyer, Albert Howe
Süleyman I, Sultan of the Turks, 1494 or 1495-1566; Turkey -- Politics and government
Before the time of Aurangzeb special care was taken to conciliate the
Hindus. Akbar adopted definitely the policy of equal treatment for all,
a degree of toleration not to be found in the contemporary Europe of
William the Silent and Henry of Navarre. The government strove to abolish
or mitigate such Hindu practices as were abhorrent to Mohammedanism, and
at least one Moslem practice which offended the Hindus. Child-marriage,
the ordeal, and animal sacrifice were forbidden. Widows were to be
burned on the funeral pyres of their husbands only with their own full
consent, and those who preferred to live might marry again. In the Rajput
tributary states Hindu law of course prevailed. Probably in the regions
under direct Mogul rule Hindus were judged by their own law when Moslems
were not concerned and perhaps even by their own judges. It is true that
the Hindus had to wait until Akbar came to be released from the personal
disabilities imposed by earlier Moslem conquerors, that their temple
lands were taxed until the time of Aurangzeb, and that Brahmans, pundits,
and fakirs were perhaps only in Akbar’s presence treated with respect
equal to that accorded _Sheiks_, _Seids_, and _Ulema_. But the emperors
and their officers gave like justice to all; they permitted every man
to worship according to the rites of his forefathers, and apparently
never had a thought, as had Selim the Cruel, of giving to all non-Moslem
subjects the choice between Islam and death. There was little ground for
discontent until Aurangzeb began to apply a harsher policy.
THE MOSLEMS AND THE MOSLEM CHURCH
In comparison with conditions in the Ottoman Empire, Moslems and
non-Moslems in the India of the early Moguls were far more nearly on
a level. This was due not merely to the toleration and indifference
of the emperors, but even more to the circumstances of the conquest,
under which both groups were treated alike, since Baber at Panipat in
1526 subdued the Moslem Lodi Sultans of Delhi, and at Kanwaha in 1527
the Hindu Rajput confederacy. Indian-born worshippers of Allah and of
Brahma, Vishnu, and Siva were mingled in the same vast mass of conquered
subjects, equally separated from the victorious invaders. There was also,
in all probability, a much greater difference of race between Baber’s
highlanders and the Moslems that he found in India than between the
latter and the Hindus; for many inter-marriages had taken place, and
many natives of India had joined the followers of the Prophet. Time, of
course, diminished this distinction.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account