The government of the Ottoman Empire in the time of Suleiman the MagnificentLybyer, Albert Howe
History
The government of the Ottoman Empire in the time of Suleiman the Magnificent
Lybyer, Albert Howe
Süleyman I, Sultan of the Turks, 1494 or 1495-1566; Turkey -- Politics and government
[407] Ricaut, 140; D’Ohsson, vii. 287.
[408] Montesquieu, livre v, ch. xix.
[409] Postel, i. 126: “les gents de la court, qui ont leurs chefs _Aga_ &
_Bassi_ pour Iuges,” etc.
[410] Spandugino, 214 ff., relates how this came about, and says (p.
218), “No _Cadi_ can have power and authority over the slaves who receive
pay from the Seigneur.”
[411] Zane, 407; Robertson, i. 249.
[412] Hammer, _Geschichte_, i. 176, 684; ii. 674.
[413] _Ibid._ i. 96. The descendants of Michael have been among the very
few families who were constituted landed nobles in the Ottoman Empire.
Seven “endowments of the Conquerors” still exist, one of which benefits
his line: Heidborn, 314.
[414] Hammer, _Geschichte_, i. 96.
[415] _Ibid._ iii. 18.
[416] Spandugino, 13; Ramberti, below, p. 242; Junis Bey, below, p. 273.
D. Barbarigo, 19, names eight great families among whom the succession
might fall (he says that some thought it should pass through the female
line): in Rumelia four,—Micali, Ersecli, Eurenesli, Egiachiali; in
Anatolia, four,—Cheselamath, Diercauli, Durcadurli, Ramadanli, formerly
called Spendial. Ricaut, 107, says that in his time there existed an
“ancient compact” by which, in default of heirs male in the Ottoman line,
the empire was to descend to the Crimean Tartars.
[417] Ricaut, 211.
[418] _Ibid._ 129: “A Turk is never reverenced but for his Office, that
is made the sole measure and rule of his greatness and honour, without
other considerations of Vertue or Nobility.”
[419] Below, ch. vii.
[420] Above, ch. iii, under heads “Other Motives for Incorporating
Christians,” “Advancement Based on Merit.”
[421] Ricaut, 129.
[422] About the year 1800, when the two institutions, and particularly
the Ruling Institution, had reached an extreme state of decay, and
before new institutions after Western models had yet been introduced,
the Ottoman Empire was to come very near to such a breaking-up. It seems
actually to have been saved by the lingering of the tradition against
heredity in office; for, though life-tenure of purchased governorships
had become regular, no Pasha except the North African corsairs of the
seventeenth century, and Ibrahim in Egypt in the early nineteenth
century, succeeded in founding a dynasty upon Ottoman soil. For the
disorders about 1800, see Heidborn, 144.
[423] Hammer, _Geschichte_, iii. 490-491, quoting Kochi Bey.
[424] See above, p. 69, note 3.
[425] Hammer, _Geschichte_, iii. 278.
[426] Hammer, _Staatsverwaltung_, 6.
[427] Postel, i. 31, says that Suleiman occasionally sent for one of his
women to visit him in the principal palace. Nicolay, 62, reports that
about 1551 Roxelana was residing within the palace grounds. By 1585 the
principal ladies of the harem had been transferred to the new palace,
leaving the old palace to the function of a training-school for recruits.
These steps illustrate the rapid increase of the importance of the harem
in the Ottoman scheme.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account