The government of the Ottoman Empire in the time of Suleiman the Magnificent — John Shaqi
The government of the Ottoman Empire in the time of Suleiman the MagnificentLybyer, Albert Howe
History
The government of the Ottoman Empire in the time of Suleiman the Magnificent
Lybyer, Albert Howe
Süleyman I, Sultan of the Turks, 1494 or 1495-1566; Turkey -- Politics and government
“These are they, in whom is reposed not only the whole government of the
state, but also the command of all the arms of this so great an empire;
and yet these are neither dukes, nor marquises, nor counts, but all by
origin are shepherds, and persons base and vile; wherefore it would be
well if this most serene republic, imitating in this direction the Grand
Signor, he who from this sort of persons, his slaves, creates and makes
the best captains, _sanjaks_ and _beylerbeys_, giving them in this way
credit and reputation....
“Just as the whole government of the affairs of the state and the command
of its arms is reposed in the hands or the control of slaves by origin
Christian, and then made Turks by various accidents; so the government
of the affairs which look toward justice, and all the charge of affairs
of religion are located in the hands of native Turks, sons of Turks, who
having been educated in the universities instituted by the Grand Signor
and the present ministers, and made learned in their laws, which consist,
both civil and criminal, in no other teaching than that of the sole book,
the Koran, become _imâms_, or priests, who govern mosques; _kazis_, or
podestas; _hojas_, or preceptors of great men; and finally _kaziaskers_,
or judges of supreme appeal, of whom there are only two, the one in Asia
and the other in Europe; and the head of all these and supreme in their
religion is the _mufti_, like the pope among us, who is chosen by the
Grand Signor.”[74]
Lastly, Matteo Zane shall speak, Venetian _Bailo_ in Constantinople
from 1591 to 1597. In the imperfect record of his vigorous report,
the illustrious diplomatist says: “The Turks are partly natives and
partly renegades; the natives, who live for the most part in Asia, are
in comparison with the renegades less depraved and less tyrannous,
because they still have in them some religion, which the others have
not,—the most arrogant and scoundrelly men that can be imagined, having
seemingly with the true faith lost all humanity. This alienation from
religion is fitting in desperate characters, who are induced to it by
licentious freedom of life, and by seeing placed in their hands the arms,
the government, the riches, and in short the whole empire, excluding
the native Turks, who are admitted only to the careers of justice, as
that of _kazi_ and the like, and to those of religion, such as _mufti_,
_hoja_, and _imâm_, as is very well known.”[75]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account