The Grand Fleet, 1914-1916 : $b its creation, development and workJellicoe, John Rushworth
History
The Grand Fleet, 1914-1916 : $b its creation, development and work
Jellicoe, John Rushworth
Great Britain. Royal Navy; Jutland, Battle of, 1916; World War, 1914-1918 -- Naval operations
A further danger soon made itself apparent. It became evident at an
early period, as many naval officers had expected, in view of German
language at the Hague Conference, that our enemy intended to throw
overboard the doctrines of international law when he could gain any
advantage by doing so. He accordingly proceeded at once to lay mines
in positions where he thought they would be advantageous to his
operations, in utter disregard of the safety, not only of British,
but also of neutral merchant ships. It was, therefore, thought very
probable that he would elaborate this practice by laying mines in the
North Sea in positions where he anticipated they might prove effective
against the Grand Fleet, and that he would do this without issuing any
warning to neutral countries. Consequently, if the main Battle Fleet
were kept moving continuously in the central and southern waters of
the North Sea, in which waters the enemy could easily lay mines with
little danger of his operations being witnessed (as he could carry
them out under cover of darkness), it was evident that considerable
risks might be incurred without our being aware of the fact. The policy
of attrition of our Battle Fleet might thus be carried out with such
success as to produce equality, or even inferiority, on the part of the
British Fleet as compared with the German, in a comparatively short
space of time. The only safeguard against such action which we could
take would be to keep mine-sweepers constantly working ahead of the
Battle Fleet. But the number of mine-sweepers that we possessed was
wholly inadequate for such a task; and even if this had not been so,
to carry out such an operation would have necessitated the speed of
the Battle Fleet being reduced to some 10 knots, the maximum sweeping
speed of mine-sweepers, and it would have been forced also to steer a
steady course without zigzagging, conditions rendering the battleships
exceedingly vulnerable to submarine attack.
The first effect, therefore, of the submarine menace, combined with
possible German action in regard to mine-laying, was to cause the
Battle Fleet to confine its movements _under ordinary conditions_ to
the more northern waters of the North Sea, where the risk might be
taken of cruising without the presence of a screen of destroyers, and
where it was improbable, owing to the depth of water and the distance
from enemy bases, that the Germans would be able to lay mines without
discovery.
The fact that this course of action would be forced upon us as the
submarine and destroyer menace grew had often been present in my mind
in pre-War days, when I had expressed the view that the beginning of
a naval war would be a conflict between the small craft, whilst the
larger and more valuable vessels were held aloof. I have no doubt that
this opinion was very generally held by officers of experience.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account