The Grand Fleet, 1914-1916 : $b its creation, development and workJellicoe, John Rushworth
History
The Grand Fleet, 1914-1916 : $b its creation, development and work
Jellicoe, John Rushworth
Great Britain. Royal Navy; Jutland, Battle of, 1916; World War, 1914-1918 -- Naval operations
As to the second point, it was possible to place the protective
bulkhead farther “inboard” in the German ships without cramping
machinery and magazine spaces, because the ships themselves were of
much greater beam. Consequently the explosion of a mine or a torpedo
against the hull of the ship was far less likely to injure the
protective bulkhead and so to admit water into the vitals of the ships
than was the case with a British vessel. The result was that, although
it is known that many German capital ships were mined and torpedoed
during the war, including several at the Jutland battle, the Germans
have not so far admitted that any were sunk, except the pre-Dreadnought
battleship _Pommern_ and the battle cruiser _Lutzow_, whose injuries
from shell fire were also very extensive.
On the other hand, British capital ships, mined or torpedoed, rarely
survived. The recorded instances of escape are the _Inflexible_ (mined
in the Dardanelles) and the _Marlborough_ (torpedoed at Jutland), and
in the latter case, although the torpedo struck at about the most
favourable spot for the ship, she had some difficulty in reaching port.
The question will be asked why it was that British ships were under
this disadvantage. The reply is that the whole of our Dreadnought
battleships, designed before the War, were hampered by the absence
of proper dock accommodation. The German Emperor once remarked to
me at Kiel on this subject, that we had made the mistake of building
our ships before we had proper dock accommodation for them, whilst
in Germany they had provided the dock accommodation first and had
designed the ships subsequently. He was quite right, although, since
docks took a long time to construct, the German policy involved delay
in shipbuilding, whereas we got ships of a type, and hence our margin
of superiority in 1914. As each successive type of Dreadnought was
designed, our constructive staff were faced with the fact that if they
went beyond a certain beam the number of docks available would be
insufficient; and it was always a matter of great difficulty to obtain
money with which to construct adequate docks. Docks make no appeal
to the imagination of the public and cost a great deal of money. The
result was that August, 1914, found us with a superiority in ships,
but woefully lacking in dock accommodation; and for this reason alone
a Fleet action early in the War, resulting in considerable damage to
heavy ships, would have produced embarrassing results.
It is only just to our very able constructive staff at the Admiralty to
point this out; it was one of the reasons which led to the German ships
being much better equipped to withstand under-water attack than were
our own. It is devoutly to be hoped that this lesson will be borne in
mind in the future, and adequate dock accommodation provided for the
Fleet.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account