=1.= _Am. Jour. Hort._, =4=:72. 1868. =2.= _Ib._, =7=:102. 1870.
=3.= _Bush. Cat._, =1883=:82. =4.= _Ill. Sta. Bul._, =28=:259.
1893. =5.= _Mo. Sta. Bul._, =46=:38, 43, 45, 46. 1899. =6.= _Ga.
Sta. Bul._, =53=:41. 1901. =7.= _Kan. Sta. Bul._, =110=:238. 1902.
Some years ago Challenge was considered an excellent dessert grape,
being of good quality, hardy, and fairly healthy. Small plantations of
it still exist in New York, but it is rapidly passing out of
cultivation.
Challenge was originated about 1860 by Archer Moore, of Hammonton, New
Jersey. He supposed it to have come from seed of Concord fertilized by
Royal Muscadine. The variety was introduced by William F. Bassett of the
same place. We do not have a vine of Challenge growing on the Station
grounds, and the description written below is compiled from various
sources.
Vine very vigorous; shoots slender, long. Leaf of medium size, dark
green. Clusters rather large, compact, tapering, usually
shouldered. Berries medium in size, round, pale red to
reddish-purple in color with very thin bloom and inconspicuous
dots, juicy, slightly acid; quality medium to good; not separating
readily from the seeds. Season shortly after Concord.
CHAMPION.
(Labrusca.)
=1.= _Am. Pom. Soc. Rpt._, =1871=:69. =2.= _Am. Hort. An._,
=1871=:83. =3.= _Horticulturist_, =30=:151. 1875. =4.= _Mich. Pom.
Soc. Rpt._, =1875=:88, 295. =5.= _Gar. Mon._, =20=:47. 1878. =6.=
_Montreal Hort. Soc. Rpt._, =1879=:93. =7.= _Am. Pom. Soc. Cat._,
=1879.= =8.= _Am. Pom. Soc. Rpt._, =1881=:36. =9.= _Bush. Cat._,
=1883=:82. =10.= _Ib._, =1883=:138. =11.= _Tenn. Sta. Bul._, Vol.
=9=:172. 1896. =12.= _N. Y. Sta. An. Rpt._, =17=:527, 528, 548,
552, 554. 1898. =13.= _Miss. Sta. Bul._, =56=:11. 1899. =14.=
Budd-Hansen, =2=:374. 1902.
_Beaconsfield_ (6, 8, 9, 11). _Champion_ (10). EARLY CHAMPION (5).
_Early Champion_ (9, 11). _Tallman?_ (5). TALLMAN SEEDLING (1, 2).
TALMAN'S SEEDLING (10). _Talman's Seedling_ (9, 11). _Talman's
Seedling_ (4). _Talman_ (10).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account