The great betrayal (La trahison des clercs)Benda, Julien
Philosophy
The great betrayal (La trahison des clercs)
Benda, Julien
Intellectuals; Nationalism; Philosophy, Modern
[168] I consider that ‘My kingdom is not of this world’ may be said by
all whose activity is not directed to practical ends: the artist, the
metaphysician, the scientist _insofar as he finds satisfaction in the
practice of science and not in its results_. Many will tell me that
they and not the Christians are the true ‘clerks’, for the Christian
accepts the ideas of justice and charity only for the sake of his
salvation. No one will deny, however, that men, even Christians, exist,
who accept this idea with no practical end in view.
[169] Malebranche, _Méditations chrétiennes_ (ix, 19).
[170] See Babeau, _Le village sous l’ancien régime_, iv, iii; L.
Gregoire, _La Ligue en Bretagne_, chap, vi; Roupnel, _La Ville et
la Campagne au xvii siècle_, i, 1. ‘The peasants,’ says M. Roumier,
‘were only really converted where it was to their interests to be
so, and especially where the local landlords put their influence at
the service of the new religion, and where the Catholic clergy had
completely deserted the parishes. We must be careful not to consider as
Protestants all the “rustics” who took part in pillaging the abbeys and
castles during the civil war’ (_La Royaume de Catherine de Médicis_,
tome ii, page 294). M. Romier quotes the remark of a contemporary: ‘The
whole of the Low Countries scarcely knows what this new doctrine is.’
[171] ‘Le livre de raison de M. Nicolas Versoris’ (_Mémoires de la
Société de l’Histoire de Paris_, tome xii). The author, avocat au
Parlement de Paris, similarly gives two lines to events like the
Connétable de Bourbon’s treachery, and the signing of the treaty of
Madrid. The same attitude exists in the _Journal d’un Bourgeois de
Paris_, 1515-1536; the public misfortunes sketched by the author leave
him completely indifferent. He makes no comment on the disaster of
Pavia. Apropos the treaty of Madrid, ‘it is to be noted,’ writes a
contemporary, ‘that there were no bonfires or rejoicings when the news
of the peace was published, because no one understood anything about
it.’ (Lavisse, _Histoire de France_, v, 49.) Contemporaries mention the
indifference of the people of Paris to the Peace of Westphalia, the
battle of Rossbach, even the battles of Valmy and Navarino. ‘The affair
at Valmy made very little stir at first.’ (Kellerman.)
[172] Michelet relates that in his youth he questioned an old man on
the impressions left upon him by 1793, and the only answer he got was:
‘It was the bad paper year.’
[173] Admire the profundity of Machiavelli, when he advises his Prince:
‘Above everything, avoid taking your subjects’ property; _for men will
more easily forget the deaths of their fathers than the loss of their
patrimony_.’
[174] Inserted in the collection of studies entitled ‘L’Allemagne et
les Alliés devant la conscience chrétienne’. (Bloud et Gay, 1915.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account