The great betrayal (La trahison des clercs)Benda, Julien
Philosophy
The great betrayal (La trahison des clercs)
Benda, Julien
Intellectuals; Nationalism; Philosophy, Modern
[175] M. Edmond Bloud quotes this remark of a German nationalist,
which might have been made on the French side of the Rhine: ‘The
Catholic world must be nationalized to re-Catholicize it.’ He adds
that in Germany it is common to hear ‘German Catholicism’ spoken of in
opposition to Roman Catholicism.
[176] And therefore it requires much more courage to do so now than in
the past.
[177] Nevertheless, Zola, Romain Rolland, and Einstein have drunk the
hemlock.
[178] When they allow themselves to be told, as Louis XVI was told by
Turgot: ‘Sire, your kingdom _is of this world_.’ There also exists ‘_a
betrayal of the laymen_’.
[179] Mgr Battifol’s writings support my argument so beautifully that I
hesitate to quote an author who plays so perfectly into my hands. For
example, he spends much time in proving that the spirit of Christianity
‘has resulted, without contradicting itself, in a doctrine of the
morality of war’.
[180] Here is a passage which, except for its violence, seems to me
to express the feelings of most modern laymen on the subject of the
patriotic loyalty of the priests: ‘The clergy of France is ardently
patriotic; it serves gallantly under fire; it absolves and glorifies
every action of the soldier; it regards the accusation of having
deserted military duty as infamous, and does it justice. It is not
for me to say whether it is in accord with the Gospels. We are simply
Frenchmen and patriots; we can only approve and admire the French
patriotic monks and priests. The French priest has no pardon for a
German, the German priest and pastor have no pardon for a Frenchman.
Mother-country first! Kill! Kill! In the name of the God of the
Christians, we absolve you, we glorify you for killing Christians!’
(Urbain Gohier, ‘La Vieille France,’ quoted by Grillot de Givry, _Le
Christ et la Patrie_, page 12.)
[181] This clearly shows in what sense Renouvier is an ‘individualist’.
[182] See his hymn to the mathematician Franz Woepfke.
[183] Jules Lemaître was explicitly this adversary.
[184] ‘For an empirical France,’ say Barrès and Bourget.
[185] ‘Note sur M. Bergson et la philosophie bergsonienne,’ Cahiers de
la Quinzaine. See my book, _Sur le Succès du Bergsonisme_, page 158.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account