The great betrayal (La trahison des clercs)Benda, Julien
Philosophy
The great betrayal (La trahison des clercs)
Benda, Julien
Intellectuals; Nationalism; Philosophy, Modern
Let me insist that what I am pointing to here, is not the modern
‘clerk’s’ extolling of the military spirit, but of the warlike
instinct. It is the cult of the warlike instinct, outside all social
spirit of discipline or sacrifice which is meant by the following
assertions of Nietzsche, glorified by a French moralist whom himself
has numerous followers:--
‘The values of the warrior aristocracy are founded on a powerful
bodily constitution, excellent health, without forgetting all that is
necessary to the upkeep of that overflowing vigour--war, adventure,
hunting, dancing, physical games and exercises, and in general
everything which implies a robust, free and joyous activity.’
‘That audacity of noble races, a mad, absurd, spontaneous audacity ...
their indifference and scorn for all safety of body, for life, comfort
...’
‘The superb blond beast wandering in search of prey and carnage ...’
‘The terrible gaiety and profound joy felt by heroes in all
destruction, in all the pleasures of victory and cruelty.’
The moralist who quotes those remarks (Sorel, _Reflexions sur la
Violence_, p. 360) adds, in order to leave no doubt about his
recommendation of them to his fellow human beings: ‘It is quite evident
that liberty would be seriously compromised if men came to look upon
the Homeric values’ (which, for him, are the values just praised by
Nietzsche) ‘as being characteristic of the barbarous peoples only.’
Is it necessary to observe how, here again, the moral presentation
dominant among the world’s educators is essentially Germanic, and
shows the bankruptcy of Graeco-Roman thought? Before our times you do
not find in France a single serious moralist (including de Maistre)
or even a poet (if you consider only the great ones) who praises the
‘pleasures of victory and cruelty’.[113] And it is the same for ancient
Rome, among the nations to whom war had given world supremacy. I do
not find a single passage which puts forward the instincts of prey
as the supreme form of human morality in Cicero, Seneca, or Tacitus,
or even in Virgil, Ovid, Lucan, and Claudian. On the other hand, I
find a great many which attribute this rank to the instincts on which
civil life is based.[114] Moreover, in primitive Greece, long before
the philosophers, the myths very soon give an important place to
civil morality. In a poem of Hesiod the tomb of Cycnus is engulfed
in the waters by Apollo’s command, because Cycnus was a brigand. The
defence of warlike instincts by Mediterranean moralists will be one
of the amazements of history. Some of them, moreover, seem uneasy
about it, and feel they ought to claim that the Homeric values (we
have seen what they mean by that) ‘are very close to the values of
Corneille’[115]--as if the French poet’s heroes, with all their sense
of devotion to duty and the State, had anything in common with lovers
of adventure, prey, and carnage!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account