The Great Controversy Between Christ and SatanWhite, Ellen Gould Harmon
ReligionComparative
The Great Controversy Between Christ and Satan
White, Ellen Gould Harmon
Good and evil; Seventh-Day Adventists -- Doctrines; Spiritual direction
At last, however, the papal sovereigns had stifled their feuds, that they
might make common cause against the Reformers. The Diet of Spires in 1526
had given each state full liberty in matters of religion until the meeting
of a general council; but no sooner had the dangers passed which secured
this concession, than the emperor summoned a second Diet to convene at
Spires in 1529 for the purpose of crushing heresy. The princes were to be
induced, by peaceable means if possible, to side against the Reformation;
but if these failed, Charles was prepared to resort to the sword.
The papists were exultant. They appeared at Spires in great numbers, and
openly manifested their hostility toward the Reformers and all who favored
them. Said Melanchthon, “We are the execration and the sweepings of the
world; but Christ will look down on His poor people, and will preserve
them.”(284) The evangelical princes in attendance at the Diet were
forbidden even to have the gospel preached in their dwellings. But the
people of Spires thirsted for the word of God, and notwithstanding the
prohibition, thousands flocked to the services held in the chapel of the
elector of Saxony.
This hastened the crisis. An imperial message announced to the Diet that
as the resolution granting liberty of conscience had given rise to great
disorders, the emperor required that it be annulled. This arbitrary act
excited the indignation and alarm of the evangelical Christians. Said one,
“Christ has again fallen into the hands of Caiaphas and Pilate.” The
Romanists became more violent. A bigoted papist declared: “The Turks are
better than the Lutherans; for the Turks observe fast-days, and the
Lutherans violate them. If we must choose between the Holy Scriptures of
God and the old errors of the church, we should reject the former.” Said
Melanchthon, “Every day, in full assembly, Faber casts some new stone at
us Gospelers.”(285)
Religious toleration had been legally established, and the evangelical
states were resolved to oppose the infringement of their rights. Luther,
being still under the ban imposed by the edict of Worms, was not permitted
to be present at Spires; but his place was supplied by his co-laborers and
the princes whom God had raised up to defend His cause in this emergency.
The noble Frederick of Saxony, Luther’s former protector, had been removed
by death; but Duke John, his brother and successor, had joyfully welcomed
the Reformation, and while a friend of peace, he displayed great energy
and courage in all matters relating to the interests of the faith.
The priests demanded that the states which had accepted the Reformation
submit implicitly to Romish jurisdiction. The Reformers, on the other
hand, claimed the liberty which had previously been granted. They could
not consent that Rome should again bring under her control those states
that had with so great joy received the word of God.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account