The Great Controversy Between Christ and SatanWhite, Ellen Gould Harmon
ReligionComparative
The Great Controversy Between Christ and Satan
White, Ellen Gould Harmon
Good and evil; Seventh-Day Adventists -- Doctrines; Spiritual direction
As a compromise it was finally proposed that where the Reformation had not
become established, the edict of Worms should be rigorously enforced; and
that “in those where the people had deviated from it, and where they could
not conform to it without danger of revolt, they should at least effect no
new reform, they should touch upon no controverted point, they should not
oppose the celebration of the mass, they should permit no Roman Catholic
to embrace Lutheranism.”(286) This measure passed the Diet, to the great
satisfaction of the popish priests and prelates.
If this edict were enforced, “the Reformation could neither be extended
... where as yet it was unknown, nor be established on solid foundations
... where it already existed.”(287) Liberty of speech would be prohibited.
No conversions would be allowed. And to these restrictions and
prohibitions the friends of the Reformation were required at once to
submit. The hopes of the world seemed about to be extinguished. “The
re-establishment of the Romish hierarchy ... would infallibly bring back
the ancient abuses;” and an occasion would readily be found for
“completing the destruction of a work already so violently shaken” by
fanaticism and dissension.(288)
As the evangelical party met for consultation, one looked to another in
blank dismay. From one to another passed the inquiry, “What is to be
done?” Mighty issues for the world were at stake. “Shall the chiefs of the
Reformation submit, and accept the edict? How easily might the Reformers
at this crisis, which was truly a tremendous one, have argued themselves
into a wrong course! How many plausible pretexts and fair reasons might
they have found for submission! The Lutheran princes were guaranteed the
free exercise of their religion. The same boon was extended to all those
of their subjects who, prior to the passing of the measure, had embraced
the reformed views. Ought not this to content them? How many perils would
submission avoid! On what unknown hazards and conflicts would opposition
launch them! Who knows what opportunities the future may bring? Let us
embrace peace; let us seize the olive-branch Rome holds out, and close the
wounds of Germany. With arguments like these might the Reformers have
justified their adoption of a course which would have assuredly issued in
no long time in the overthrow of their cause.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account