The great fraud of UlsterHealy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
History
The great fraud of Ulster
Healy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
Ireland -- History -- 17th century; Ulster (Northern Ireland and Ireland) -- History
The “pension” story rested on the fact that originally Strafford
agreed to allow the Chichesters £40 a year in lieu of the £100
received under the Londoners’ lease of Lough Neagh. This, to soothe
the family, he increased to £60; and, instead of paying it by the
clumsy method of a pension (as was at first intended), he reduced the
rent under the Patent by £60. The change did away with the earlier
proposal, and was gladly welcomed by Lord Chichester. Yet Charles II.
was told that Wandesforde had robbed the persecuted and faithful peer
of a £40 pension. To prove it Lord Donegall produced the first Order
of the Commissioners as to the £40, and suppressed the second as to
the £60. The first Order fitted in with Clotworthy’s £40 rental to
the Crown, which Lord Donegall was seeking to capture, and balanced
beautifully with the “equities” which he contended for. Any distorted
story of this kind went unscrutinised by the gay advisers of Charles
II.
It fell in with the purposes of Lord Massereene that Lord Donegall
should secure a reversion of his lease. To him it was immaterial
to whom he paid rent, or who succeeded to the fisheries after his
term expired. Lord Donegall’s success would strengthen him against
the Londoners as to the Bann, for each would have an interest in
resisting their claims. Accordingly the twain “got together”; and
thenceforth the new peer became the ally of his late rival.
The symmetry of the proposal that the “lost pension” of one
nobleman should be supplied from the rent due to the Crown by the
other, captivated the courtiers at Whitehall. It was such a pretty
arrangement, and so historically just in the eyes of all who had been
bribed to promote it. In the golden days of the Restoration, the
thinnest coating of fact served to veneer any romance put forward
by a favourite. Charles II. was an accommodating prince. What cared
he for recitals in parchments? There was no one even to remind him
that, in the draft of his Charter to the Londoners (then almost ready
for his signature), the Bann was once more declared their property.
So three months after Clotworthy’s triumph the King yielded to Lord
Donegall’s prayer, and, on the 28th February, 1661, a “Letter” was
made out authorising a Patent to him of “the reversion” of Lough
Neagh and the Bann, with an immediate gift of the rent of £40 a year
coming from the new lease of Lord Massereene.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account