The great fraud of UlsterHealy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
History
The great fraud of Ulster
Healy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
Ireland -- History -- 17th century; Ulster (Northern Ireland and Ireland) -- History
The Royal Letter was embellished by recitals drafted by Lord
Donegall and crammed with untruth. It set forth that James I., in
1621, granted the fishings unto Arthur, Lord Chichester; that in
1638, “to comply with our late royal father’s occasions,” they were
surrendered to Charles I.; that in consideration of this generosity,
the Chichesters should have received “an annuity, pension, or yearly
rent-charge of £40 per annum,” with liberty to fish for the provision
of their households; but that they were disappointed as to all these
promises. This was a moving tale of unrequited loyalty; yet the brows
of even the Merrie Monarch would have knit had he been told a tithe
of the truth.
The parchments of the previous half-century contradicted every item
of this rigmarole and showed what an accurate recital should have
disclosed. This was:—
That James Hamilton, through the abuse of spent warrants, came by
extravagant grants in collusion with Chichester;
That Hamilton made over much of the property to the Deputy, who,
to cloak his rapine, issued a Patent for it to his nephew without
kingly sanction, and by the misuse of a Royal Commission;
That the nephew assigned to his uncle all that the Patent conveyed,
including the Bann and Lough Neagh;
That, after the Bann was given by Charter to the City of London,
£4,500 was paid by his Majesty to “compensate” Hamilton and
Chichester;
That a bogus “surrender” to the Crown of the Bann was then made;
That, seven years later, Chichester (after his removal from the
Deputyship), as Lord Treasurer, asserted title to the River by
means of false entries in the Crown ledgers;
That, by “favour” of the Duke of Buckingham, a King’s Letter was
procured in 1620 for a regrant of his estates;
That on this warrant, through the knavery of escheators and
inquisitors, another Patent giving him the non-tidal Bann was
fabricated in 1621;
That in 1640 Strafford, on discovering the facts, enforced against
his heirs a surrender of the river, with Lough Neagh; and
That for this they were lavishly recouped by a Patent granting them
valid title to vast properties unjustly come by, with an allowance
off their rent of £60 a year.
In the days of the Stuarts, truth and patents were estranged.
On the 10th April, 1662, the Charter to the Londoners was signed.
Charles II. gave them once more the River Bann, from Lough Neagh
to the sea, as if no adverse grant had been made to Chichester or
Clotworthy. He did so in the same words as it had been conveyed to
them by James I. and Cromwell.
Two Patents of the river to different interests, within 18 months,
was a monstrosity, even for Anglo-Ireland; but not a ripple was
raised thereby on the surface of official calm.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account