The great fraud of UlsterHealy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
History
The great fraud of Ulster
Healy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
Ireland -- History -- 17th century; Ulster (Northern Ireland and Ireland) -- History
As for the fishery Patent, hurriedly rushed forth by casual Lords
Justices to cheat the Londoners and the public, it is the only
warrant of the Deputy’s descendants to control Lough Neagh and the
Bann. By its “virtue” the right enjoyed by the people of a province
from time immemorial to earn a livelihood as their fathers did was
challenged, and an exasperating monopoly attempted to be established.
Those who applaud the statecraft which resulted in the spoliation of
the princes of Tyrone and Tirconnell may well ask themselves whether
the breed which supplanted them is such a vast improvement. No
catalogue heretofore drawn up of the sins of Irish chieftains brands
them as cheats or forgers—though many other libels against them are
extant from the pens of those by whom they were robbed.
CHAPTER XXV.
HOW TO LOSE AN EMPIRE.
In the century which followed the reign of the Stuarts no record
worth mention remains of the doings of Lord Donegall’S descendants.
Gaelic annalists, who would have cherished local chronicles, had
been driven out; and British civilisation had not overtaken or
undertaken their work. That the Chichester frauds formed part of a
long-continued system practised by the heads of the Executive appears
from another exposure made, nearly a century later, in the English
House of Commons. After the Revolution, Charles Montagu (subsequently
Earl of Halifax, who was appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer in
1694), was accused on the 16th February, 1698, of having in the
previous year obtained for himself a grant, under the name of Thomas
Railton, of forfeited estates in Ireland worth some £13,000. The
lands included those of Lord Clancarty. Montagu, having a majority
in the House, defiantly admitted the charge. In 1701, however, he
was impeached, on this and other grounds. He again did not deny the
facts, and pleaded the authority of King William III. Ultimately, the
impeachment was abandoned as impracticable, but Montagu was struck
off the Privy Council.
Many of the Elizabethan and Stuart grants reveal a purpose, not only
to seize the land of the natives, but to reduce them into slavery.
Elizabeth’s charter to the Smiths in 1571 gave, with the territory
to be conquered, “native men and women” as chattels. Chichester
declared in 1602 that the Irish “should be made perpetual slaves to
her Majesty”; and he wished to send O’Cahan to the Virginias instead
of to the Tower. In 1605 Hamilton was awarded by James I. “native
men and women villeins and their followers.” In 1613 the charter to
the Londoners enabled them to take “estrayed bondmen and bondwomen
and villeins and their followers.” A Patent of Charles I. presented
Hamilton, after he became Lord Claneboy, with “natives and villeins
with their sequels.” Cromwell’s shipments of Irish youth as slaves to
the Barbadoes was merely a development of this policy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account