The great fraud of UlsterHealy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
History
The great fraud of Ulster
Healy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
Ireland -- History -- 17th century; Ulster (Northern Ireland and Ireland) -- History
With the knowledge that a Plantation was resolved on, the Deputy,
on the 13th January, 1608, raised anew the question of Sir Randal’s
“fourth.” He coolly referred to it in a letter to Cecil as “the
case in controversy between Sir Randal MacDonnell and Mr. James
Hamilton, concerning the fourth part of the fishery of the Bann,
sometime debated before me, and order thereupon made by myself and
the Council.” He went on to announce that he had “caused the King’s
learned counsel here to draw the case according to the records,” and
was sending it to London for the information of the Privy Council.
This admission that he had acted as judge in the action might seem to
show candour, but no one then was aware that MacDonnell’s fishery had
been conveyed to him. The Deputy’s adjudication in Hamilton’s favour
was the counterpart of his decision in O’Cahan v. O’Neill; yet,
so obscure were his devices, that the fact that he was personally
interested in the suit lay hidden for three centuries. The Attorney
and Solicitor-General, who “drew the case according to the records,”
knew the truth, but suppressed it. So, the Privy Council, unaware of
the guilty secret, allowed the sequestration to be re-imposed for the
third time, to the despair of Randal, who hastened to London in June,
1608. This time he met with failure there, for Chichester was now
all-powerful. His journey, however, so much upset the Deputy that, to
baffle MacDonnell beyond hope of recovery, he resorted to a desperate
shift. It took the shape of transferring his fishery to a stranger;
by which device it was hoped to raise an insurmountable obstacle in
his path. To give solemnity to the stratagem, Chichester, by an act
of State, gave it validity in the King’s name. On the 1st July, 1608,
while MacDonnell was making his way to the steps of the Throne his
“fourth” was conferred by Patent (with much other gear) on “our dear
Arthur Bassett of Dublin.”
Here indeed was legerdemain. James Hamilton we know; Thomas Irelande
we know; Auditor Ware we know; John Wakeman we know; John King we
know; Carew and Cary we know; but who was this new ensign of the
brigand troupe? He appeared in the lists with vizor down, and was
previously unknown to fame. The stranger, however, was no less a
person than Chichester’s nephew—fresh landed a year before from
Devonshire.
The manufacture for him of a Patent purporting to affectionately
embody the royal wishes was a masterstroke.
CHAPTER XI.
THE DEPUTY’S NEPHEW.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account