The great fraud of UlsterHealy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
History
The great fraud of Ulster
Healy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
Ireland -- History -- 17th century; Ulster (Northern Ireland and Ireland) -- History
In April, 1629, Falkland was recalled by the unanimous voice of the
Privy Council. He wrote to Charles I. on the 13th April, 1629:—“I
hear that the question of Felim is to be made the ground of my recall
owing to the machinations of the Chancellor and Commissioners. It is
a disgrace to your Royal Justice that I should be recalled before
being heard in my defence.” The King did not reply. In July, 1629,
the Lord Chancellor (Loftus) and Lord Cork were ordered to “take up
the Sword” and act in his place.
Falkland remained in Dublin for several months, and the spirit which
beset him burns fiercely through his final dispatches. He threatened
Sir Francis Annesley with the Star Chamber for his “undutiful
contempt” in saving Felim. He sued Sir Arthur Savage for alleged
debt; and his warning to the English Secretary of State gleams with
a comic touch:—“I pray you think of the results that will follow if
Patents (which Gondomar[1] did term the common faith) be overridden.
Your fortune rests on the sanctity of such Patents.”
He returned to England not hopelessly disgraced, for he was appointed
to the Privy Council; and the King allowed him to name a Committee
of that body in November, 1629, to investigate his conduct. If the
Committee reached any conclusions or took any evidence they have been
withheld from the world. On the 12th November, 1629, he boastfully
wrote to Primate Ussher that at Court there was “not one wry look in
any creature towards me.”
Falkland’s daughter married Sir Terence O’Dempsey, who was also
implicated in the conspiracy to strip the O’Byrnes. In 1631 the
ex-Deputy’s retirement was soothed by O’Dempsey’s being translated
into “Lord Glenmalire.”
The King having ridded Ireland of Falkland, thought Deputies a trifle
out of fashion. So Lord Cork and Chancellor Loftus were allowed to
govern the country for nearly four years as “Justices.” In that
interval their own Patents, at least, were safe from scrutiny. Lord
Cork sometimes scattered gems of wisdom through his correspondence
as lustrous as Falkland’s. In 1631 he sighed:—“This place is not a
comfortable one unless a man consoles himself by making a private
fortune—as has been the custom of my predecessors.”
Under Strafford, in 1639, a Statute was passed whereby the “Birns
Country” with “Ranelagh, Cosha, Shillela and Vartry” were declared
the King’s. This was done, apparently, for the purpose of enabling
valid Patents to be issued. By this arrangement some of the O’Byrnes
must have recovered patches of their estate, as they paid the Crown
£17,000 for “remedy of Defective Title.” Ere the century ended
Cromwellian and Williamite confiscations made this investment a
barren one for the family.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] The Spanish Ambassador to London.
CHAPTER XIX.
STRAFFORD, PATENT-BREAKER.
When Lord Falkland left Ireland, the question of the validity of the
Wakeman grants was re-opened under the rule of the Lords Justices.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account