The great fraud of UlsterHealy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
History
The great fraud of Ulster
Healy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
Ireland -- History -- 17th century; Ulster (Northern Ireland and Ireland) -- History
A King’s Letter of the 24th September, 1638, was obtained by the
Commissioners to authorise them to accept the surrender. No mention
was made of the Bann, for no one regarded it as Chichester’s. The
King’s Letter cast doubt even on his right to Lough Neagh, and
sarcastically narrates that his Majesty had been informed that the
fishing and soil thereof were “granted away” by Letters Patent to the
late Lord Chichester, but were found “so commodious for upholding the
fishing of the Bann that the London Corporation were necessitated to
farm the same at £100 a year—which fishing of the Bann is now come
to our hands.” Short work was thus made of the 1621 Patent and of
Allen’s “finding” at Carrickfergus. The Letter further recited that
Viscount Chichester had compounded for a surrender of Lough Neagh in
consideration of £40 a year; and that this sum could be deducted from
the rent payable to the Crown under a new Patent. The Chichesters
were to have liberty to take salmon for domestic use, and to retain
the eel-weirs at Toome, subject to royal regulations.
On the 7th December, 1638, the Commissioners made an “Order of
Composition” embodying these terms, but the family evidently
contended that the allowance of £40 a year was not a fair set-off
for the £100 paid by the Londoners. Brisk haggling followed, and at
length Strafford agreed to an amended “Order of Composition,” dated
the 19th September, 1639. This raised the £40 annual allowance to
£60, but all privileges of fishing were withdrawn. The Chichesters
agreed. This amendment brought their rent under the proposed new
Patent to within £2 16s. 6d. of that previously paid, and the fine
was fixed at £467 17s. 6d.
An indefeasible Patent was now to be granted them, and with this
bargain they and Strafford were satisfied. The arrangement dealt a
deathstroke at the oft-challenged title of the Devonians to the great
Ulster fishery. It submerged the Patent of 1604 with those of 1606,
1608, and 1621 in a common condemnation.
When the terms of the surrender came to be drawn up in 1639, although
the King’s Letter mentioned Lough Neagh only, Strafford required that
the Bann should be also renounced, and this was agreed to. Before he
finally left Ireland the new Patent was not ready. It was sealed in
September, 1640, by his Deputy, Wandesforde, after his departure.
Everything was accepted by the Chichesters without a murmur. Neither
on Strafford’s impeachment at Westminster in 1641 nor when the
Planters in the Dublin Parliament impeached his chaplain, Bramhall,
did they join in hounding him down.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account