The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power to National AdvantageAngell, Norman
History
The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power to National Advantage
Angell, Norman
Commercial policy; Disarmament; Imperialism; War; War, Cost of
Whenever our Empire and maritime ascendancy are challenged it
will be by such an invasion in force as was once designed by
Philip and Parma, and again by Napoleon. It is this certainty
which compels me to modify the anti-militarist policy which I
have consistently maintained for forty years past.... To me now
it is no question of loss of prestige--no question of the
shrinkage of the Empire; it is our existence as a foremost
European Power, and even as a thriving nation.... If ever our
naval defence were broken through, our Navy overwhelmed or even
dispersed for a season, and a military occupation of our
arsenals, docks, and capital were effected, the ruin would be
such as modern history cannot parallel. It would not be the
Empire, but Britain, that would be destroyed.... The occupation
by a foreign invader of our arsenals, docks, cities, and
capital would be to the Empire what the bursting of the boilers
would be to a _Dreadnought_. Capital would disappear with the
destruction of credit.... A catastrophe so appalling cannot be
left to chance, even if the probabilities against its occurring
were 50 to 1. But the odds are not 50 to 1. No high authority
ventures to assert that a successful invasion of our country is
absolutely impossible if it were assisted by extraordinary
conditions. And a successful invasion would mean to us the
total collapse of our Empire, our trade, and, with trade, the
means of feeding forty millions in these islands. If it is
asked, "Why does invasion threaten more terrible consequences
to us than it does to our neighbors?" the answer is that the
British Empire is an anomalous structure, without any real
parallel in modern history, except in the history of Portugal,
Venice, and Holland, and in ancient history Athens and
Carthage. Our Empire presents special conditions both for
attack and for destruction. And its destruction by an enemy
seated on the Thames would have consequences so awful to
contemplate that it cannot be left to be safeguarded by one
sole line of defence, however good, and for the present hour
however adequate.... For more than forty years I have raised my
voice against every form of aggression, of Imperial expansion,
and Continental militarism. Few men have more earnestly
protested against postponing social reforms and the well-being
of the people to Imperial conquests and Asiatic and African
adventures. I do not go back on a word that I have uttered
thereon. But how hollow is all talk about industrial
reorganization until we have secured our country against a
catastrophe that would involve untold destitution and misery on
the people in the mass--which would paralyze industry and raise
food to famine prices, whilst closing our factories and our
yards!
CHAPTER III
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account