The Great Indian Epics : $b The Stories of the Ramayana and the Mahabharata
History
The Great Indian Epics : $b The Stories of the Ramayana and the Mahabharata
Epic literature, Sanskrit -- Adaptations; Heroes -- India -- Fiction; Hindu mythology -- Fiction; India -- Social life and customs -- Fiction
The “Bhagavatgita” early attracted the attention of Europeans, and was
translated into English by Sir Charles Wilkins in the time of Warren
Hastings, who himself wrote an introduction to it. Wilkins’ translation
has been followed by those of Thompson and Davis, and by Sir Edwin
Arnold’s metrical version entitled “The Song Celestial.” The poem has
been rendered into both Latin and Greek, and into most of the leading
languages of Europe, and has secured the highest encomiums possible
from literary and philosophical men in all countries, on account of its
lofty tone and striking conceptions.
The reader will remember that the “Bhagavatgita” is a dialogue
between Krishna and Arjuna, on the eve of the tremendous struggle at
Kurukshetra, and that the dialogue arose out of the refusal of the
latter to take part in a contest destined to lead to such unprecedented
slaughter of kinsfolk.
It appears from the “Gita” that Arjuna was not only moved by feelings
of tenderness towards his kinsmen, but was appalled at the thought of
the far-reaching consequences of the impending slaughter of so many
men. His prescient mind foresaw that the wholesale destruction of the
Kshatriyas would tend to serious immorality amongst their women, and
thus lead to that most dreadful of all calamities--_the mingling of
different castes!_ Such an evil was not to be contemplated, except with
the extremest religious horror, since so great a sin as a _confusion
of castes_ would inevitably lead men to the hell prepared for the
wicked, and even entail the fall of ancestral spirits from the religion
of the blessed, “their rites of Pinda and water ceasing” through the
defilement of their descendants. This was a terrible prospect to face,
but a more immediate if less weighty objection presented itself to
Arjuna in a doubt as to whether it was lawful for him to contend with
his ancient relative Bhisma and his Brahman preceptor Drona, both of
whom were eminently worthy of his highest respect.[114]
Krishna proceeds to overcome Arjuna’s scruples, first by dwelling upon
the indestructibility of the soul, and then by insisting that the duty
of a Kshatriya being to fight, it was right and proper for Arjuna to
take part in the battle, regardless of consequences. He further assumes
the responsibility for the deeds that may be done by Arjuna at his
suggestion. On these points Krishna says: “Those that are really wise
grieve neither for the dead nor the living. It is not that I or you or
those rulers of men never were, or that all of us shall not hereafter
be.... As a man casting off robes that are worn out putteth on others
that are new, so the embodied (soul) casting off bodies that are worn
out entereth other bodies that are new. Weapons cleave it not, fire
consumeth it not, the waters do not drench it nor doth the wind waste
it.... There is no (objective) existence of anything that is distinct
from the soul, nor non-existence of anything possessing the virtues of
the soul.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account