The great Persian War and its preliminaries : $b A study of the evidence, literary and topographicalGrundy, G. B. (George Beardoe)
History
The great Persian War and its preliminaries : $b A study of the evidence, literary and topographical
Grundy, G. B. (George Beardoe)
Greece -- History -- Persian Wars, 500-449 B.C.
The means of creating the diversion were both obvious and easy. Persia,
through the intermediary of her subjects the Phœnicians, had excellent
means of communicating with and influencing the great Carthaginian
power. This influence must have been largely increased by the favour
which Persia showed to the Phœnician as against the Greek trader.
It is unnecessary to point to the fact that Carthage would presumably
require but little persuasion to attack the rival Greek in Sicily at a
time when no help could possibly be given from Greece itself.
◆H vii. 166.◆
The Sicilian Greek seems to have had no sort of doubt as to the
connection between the invasion of his own island and that of the
mother country. ◆H. vii. 165. _ad init._◆ Herodotus, even in spite of
his bias towards the Greek version of the story, ◆H vii. 166.◆ gives
some hint of a different version in Sicily. ◆Frag. Hist. Græc.◆ He
does not apparently know much about it, as he does not mention Himera
as the locality of the decisive battle.
◆Frag. III. Schol. Pind.◆
It is in a fragment of Ephoros that occurs the first extant historical
reference to the connection between the two expeditions. ◆Pyth.
i. 146.◆ He says that Persian and Phœnician ambassadors were sent to
the Carthaginians, “ordering” them to invade Sicily with as large
an expedition as possible, and after subduing it, to come on to the
Peloponnese. Discredit has been cast on the passage in consequence
of the use of the word “order,” because, so it is said, the Persians
were not in a position to give orders to Carthage. But, supposing the
use of the word is not merely an instance of verbal inaccuracy, it is
quite conceivable that a Greek historian might use such an expression
to describe the supposed relations between the mother state of Phœnicia
and her colony. ◆Diod. xi. 1.◆ The historian Diodorus recognizes the
same connection between the two expeditions. He does not, however, make
any reference to Phœnician agency in the matter, nor does he speak of
an “order,” but of a diplomatic agreement.[106]
#SICILIAN TRADITION.#
One question remains: Did Gelo ever seriously entertain the idea
of sending help to the mother country? It is hardly conceivable that he
did. The Carthaginian preparations were on such a scale that he must
have been long forewarned of the coming storm. Whether he made any sort
of offer to the Greek embassy is quite another question.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account