The great Persian War and its preliminaries : $b A study of the evidence, literary and topographicalGrundy, G. B. (George Beardoe)
History
The great Persian War and its preliminaries : $b A study of the evidence, literary and topographical
Grundy, G. B. (George Beardoe)
Greece -- History -- Persian Wars, 500-449 B.C.
In his private interview with Eurybiades, Themistocles, so he says,
adopted as his own the argument suggested by Mnesiphilos, and with its
aid so far persuaded that much vexed but apparently honest patriot of
the inadvisability of the decision to which the Council of War had
recently come, that he consented to call another meeting to reconsider
the subject. This was the famous meeting at which the fate of Greece
was decided; and it may be regarded as certain that, as is invariably
the case with the crises of great historical tragedies, later tradition
did not allow the incidents of the situation to lose dramatic force in
the telling. Though the dramatic element is not absent from Herodotus’
version, it gives a strong impression of being in the main a true
account of what took place. The historian seems to have exercised a
powerful self-control over himself in writing the account of what he
knew well to have been the most critical moment in the history of his
race; and he has, in consequence, succeeded in making his description
of this gathering of the Greek commanders one of the most striking
pictures in his history.
◆H. viii. 59.◆
“And when they had assembled, before Eurybiades put the question about
which he had called the generals together, Themistocles spoke long and
earnestly. As he was speaking the Corinthian commander, Adeimantos,
the son of Okytos, said: ‘At the games, Themistocles, those who start
too soon are scourged.’ But he, justifying his action, answered, ‘Yes,
and those left at the post do not win the prize.’ On this occasion his
retort to the Corinthian was mild in character; but to Eurybiades he
did not use his previous arguments, to the effect that the fleet, if
it left Salamis, would disperse; for in the presence of the allies it
did not become him to accuse any one. #COUNCIL OF WAR AT SALAMIS.# He
relied on a different argument, and spoke as follows: ‘The salvation
of Greece is in your hands if you be persuaded by me to remain and
give battle in this place, and do not yield to those here present who
urge you to remove the fleet to the Isthmus. Hear now and judge
between the two plans. If you engage off the Isthmus you will fight in
the open sea, and it is highly inexpedient for us to put out thither,
because our ships are heavier and fewer in number; and, again, you
will lose Salamis, Megara, and Ægina, even if we are successful in
other respects. For the Persians’ land army will accompany their
fleet, and so you will be responsible for bringing them to the
Peloponnese, and will place the whole of Greece in peril. But if you
do as I say, you will find the following great advantages in my plan.
In the first place, by engaging in the strait with few ships against
many, we shall win a great victory, if the war takes the course that
may be expected; for it is in our favour to fight in the narrow seas,
just as it is in their favour to fight in the open. Again Salamis, in
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account