The Great Steel Strike and its LessonsFoster, William Z.
History
The Great Steel Strike and its Lessons
Foster, William Z.
Steel Strike, U.S., 1919-1920; United States Steel Corporation
Naturally, they repeated the accusations about white men not taking
negroes in their unions, a charge which was not true in the packing
industry. The organizers replied by launching a vigorous campaign to get
them into the unions. Then the propaganda was sent forth that the only
reason the whites were willing to take the blacks into their locals was
because the latter, being in a minority, could exert no control; that
the whites would not dare to give them a local of their own, etc. This
was met by the establishment of a negro local of miscellaneous workers
in a convenient neighborhood. Then the Jim Crow cry was raised that the
whites wanted the blacks to herd by themselves. This the organizers
answered by insisting that a free transfer system be kept up between the
white and black locals. These were affiliated with the basic
organization of the industry, the Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher
Workmen of North America.
But even this did not satisfy; the anti-union propaganda went on
undiminished and with tremendous effect. It is true that some
far-sighted negro intellectuals defended the unions; but they were as
men crying in the wilderness; the others prevailed. And although the
unions kept a crew of negro organizers in the field, and won many
concessions for the packing house workers, including the eight hour day,
right of collective bargaining, large increases in wages, 40 hour weekly
guarantee, retroactive pay, seniority rights, etc., they have never
succeeded in organizing the negroes.
They know little of the race problem in industry who declare that it can
be settled merely by the unions opening their doors to the negroes. It
is much more complex than that, and will require the best thought that
conscientious whites and blacks can give it. The negro has the more
difficult part to solve, in resisting the insidious efforts of
unscrupulous white employers and misguided intellectuals of his own race
to make a professional strike-breaker of him. But I am confident that he
will win out and will take his place where he belongs in the industrial
fight, side by side with the white worker.
FOOTNOTES:
[18] Senate Committee Steel Strike Hearings, page 532.
[19] In steel industry usage (followed in this book unless otherwise
noted) the term "foreigners" applies chiefly to the nationalities of the
later immigrations, including the Slavic races, Roumanians, Bulgarians,
Hungarians, Greeks, Italians and others from Eastern and Southern
Europe. These are the so-called "hunkies." The peoples of the earlier
immigrations--the English, Irish, Scotch, Welsh, Germans and
Scandinavians--who speak our language, hold good jobs, and are generally
well established, are not exactly considered Americans, but they are
rarely called foreigners.
[20] The brazen frankness with which this policy was carried out is
illustrated by the following advertisement, which appeared in the
Pittsburgh _Gazette-Times_, July 15, 1909, during the big steel strike
of that time:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account