Burlington Strike, 1888; Labor unions -- United States; Railroads -- United States -- Employees
The resolution was rejected by the Chicago men, and, in fact, by every
body of strikers along the entire system. In these terms of settlement
nothing was said about dismissing the dynamite cases, it being
understood that they would be continued.
July 17 the Committee left Chicago to place the proposition before the
men, and returned July 27. The strikers everywhere decided to accept no
terms that did not include the signing of their schedule and the
absolute discharge of all the new men. They considered that the company
had asked them to make an unconditional surrender, and that the
conspiracy cases had influenced their leaders to side with the company,
and they would not now make any settlement that was not made by the
entire Grievance Committee and include the whole schedule and discharge
of the new men. Hoge and Murphy knew the temper of the men and knew
what the result would be, but felt it their duty to present the
propositions as instructed by their chiefs, Arthur and Sargent, and to
give the men a complete statement of the condition of the strike,
prospects of support, etc. It was a disagreeable duty, but they
performed it faithfully. Many of the men were inclined to censure the
Committee for presuming to offer them such terms.
UNION MEETING AT ST. JOE, July 24, 1888.
The following is the official report:
The Chairman stated the purpose of the meeting was to discuss the
merits of the C., B. & Q. strike and to try and adopt some plan to
bring it to a speedy termination. He also explained and outlined
the situation of affairs on the C., B. & Q. R. R.
The Chairman then introduced Bro. G. W. Hitchens, Chairman of the
G. G. Com., K. C., Ft. S. & G. R. R., who made a good speech,
encouraging the C., B. & Q. Bros. and saying that he was in favor
of the Boycott and Federation.
Bro. R. Powers, a member of the B. of R. B., was then introduced,
and spoke encouragingly to the C., B. & Q. Bros., telling them to
stand firm and they were sure to win.
Bro. F. P. Sargent, G. M. of the B. of L. F., was the next speaker.
He was in favor of Federation, but did not speak very encouragingly
to the C., B. & Q. Bros. in their struggle for Right and Justice.
Bro. Bailey, of the S. M. A. A., made an able address, which was
enthusiastically received.
Bro. L. W. Rodgers, of the B. of R. B., and a man who has traveled
over the C., B. & Q. R. R. several times, spoke and outlined the
condition of the C., B. & Q., and urged the the Bros. to stand firm
and they were sure of victory.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account