"The Greatest Failure in All History": A Critical Examination of the Actual Workings of Bolshevism in RussiaSpargo, John
History
"The Greatest Failure in All History": A Critical Examination of the Actual Workings of Bolshevism in Russia
Spargo, John
Communism -- Russia
All those who have studied the Russian villages of our day
clearly perceive that _the process of demoralization and
decay is going on there with remarkable speed_. The peasants
have taken the land away from its owners, divided it among
themselves, and destroyed the agricultural implements. _And
they are getting ready to engage in a bloody internecine
struggle for the division of the booty._ In certain districts
the population has consumed the entire grain-supply, including
the seed. In other districts the peasants are hiding their
grain underground, for fear of being forced to share it with
starving neighbors. This situation cannot fail to lead to
chaos, destruction, and murder.[7]
[7] Italics mine.--J. S.
As a matter of fact the “bloody internecine struggle” had been going
on for some time. Even before the overthrow of Kerensky there had been
many of these village wars. The Bolshevist Government did not make any
very serious attempt to interfere with the peasant movements for the
distribution of land for some time after the _coup d’état_. It was too
busy trying to consolidate its position in the cities, and especially
to organize production in the factories. There was not much to be done
with the farms at that season of the year. Early in the spring of 1918
agents of the Soviet Government began to appear in the villages. Their
purpose was to supervise and regulate the distribution of the land.
Since a great deal of the land had already been seized and distributed
by the peasants, this involved some interference on the part of the
central Soviet power in matters which the peasants regarded themselves
as rightfully entitled to settle in their own way.
This gave rise to a bitter conflict between the peasants and the
central Soviet authorities. If the peasants had confiscated and
partitioned the land, however inequitably, they regarded their deed
as conclusive and final. The attempt of the Soviet agents to “revise”
their actions they regarded as robbery. The central Soviet authorities
had against them all the village population with the exception of the
disgruntled few. If the peasants had not yet partitioned the land they
were suspicious of outsiders coming to do it. The land was their own;
the city men had nothing to do with it. In hundreds of villages the
commissions sent by the Bolsheviki to carry out the provisions of the
land program were mobbed and brutally beaten, and in many cases were
murdered. The issue of _Vlast Naroda_ (_Power of the People_) for May,
1918, contained the following:
In Bielo all members of the Soviets have been murdered.
In Soligalich two of the most prominent members of the Soviets
have literally been torn to pieces. Two others have been beaten
half dead.
In Atkarsk several members of the Soviets have been killed. In
an encounter between the Red Guards and the masses, many were
killed and wounded. The Red Guards fled.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account