The greatest story in the world, period 1 (of 3) : $b [From the earliest times to A. D. 100]Hutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
History
The greatest story in the world, period 1 (of 3) : $b [From the earliest times to A. D. 100]
Hutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
World history
It is a curious thing about these Semites, who at a very early date
came in and took possession of all Babylonia, that though they
apparently came from Arabia and the south, they made their first
appearance in history in the north of Babylonia. How that happened
we cannot tell. Perhaps some records of a southern invasion have
been lost. Or they may have skirted round on the eastern side. It
is all guess-work. They appeared in the north, and they quickly
overran the country--not only of Babylonia, but of Palestine and of
Syria also--except, it may be, a strip of Syria along the
Mediterranean shore which is called on the map Phœnicia. That is
an exception which you will do well to bear in mind. It is
important, because these Phœnicians belonged to one of the
greatest civilisations of the old world, and because they too were
great makers of history, as you shall see before very long.
[Sidenote: "Ur of the Chaldees"]
On their western border, therefore, the people of the powerful empire
which began to be formed along the Tigris and Euphrates had tribes
very closely akin to themselves. On the east and on the north they
had neighbours of a different race from their own. It seems to have
been in the south of Babylonia, near the outgoing of the great
rivers, that the first capital of the empire was formed. Probably
this southern Babylonia is that "Ur of the Chaldees" from which we
are told that Abraham came and established himself in Palestine. He
came, as we see, living with {56} his family and his dependants in
tents, with flocks and herds, easily moving on from one place to
another when the sheep or oxen had eaten the grass or when water
failed. He was the patriarch (_pater_=father, and _arch_=ruler), the
father-ruler of the small tribe or large family that came with him.
In your history books you will sometimes read that "society was in
the patriarchal stage." That means that the people of whom the
historian is writing were living in the way in which Abraham and his
dependent people lived; and we may be sure that it was the way of
life of the greater number of those Semites who came up from Arabia
and took possession of Syria and Palestine at a very early date.
They took possession of the country of Babylonia also, and as they
settled along the fertile river-banks we may imagine that they would
begin to unite together into a nation and become strong, with a
feeling of union, in a way that it was not at all likely that the
small tribes of patriarchs and their families, moving about with
their flocks and herds, would unite. So the Babylonians and the
Syrians and the dwellers in Palestine would easily fall into the way
of regarding each other as of different nations, although really they
were of the same race.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account