The greatest story in the world, period 2 (of 3) : $b The further story of the Old World up to the discovery of the NewHutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
History
The greatest story in the world, period 2 (of 3) : $b The further story of the Old World up to the discovery of the New
Hutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
World history
Thus, although the boundaries of the Empire stood in the year A.D.
300 much as they had stood a hundred years before, the Empire within
had grown far weaker. If the barbarian should break through again,
as it was most likely that he would, there would not be the old
strength to repel him. But, before we come to the actual
breaking-through point, we would do well to consider a question which
I expect will have come to your minds: What sort of people, of what
race, and of what habits of life were these barbarians, so-called,
and what was the reason why they kept on thus trying to break in upon
the Empire?
We get our first knowledge of the way of life of these barbarians
from the great Roman historian Tacitus; and his account is especially
interesting to us, who are English, because it is the account of the
way in which those people lived who were our own ancestors. For the
very name of English or Englishmen, we may take it, was not known in
the Britain of that day, nor for some time after A.D. 300. There
were English, as we have noted, in Sleswig, and to north and south of
them were Jutes and Saxons. The three were closely allied in race
and in language, and the Romans, because they came into touch with
the Saxons chiefly, the most southern of the tribes, called them all
Saxon. It seems, however, that among themselves they commonly used
the word English, which strictly was the name of the nation or tribe
in the middle, to include all three tribes. All were Englishmen, but
the Jutes and Saxons were distinct, though allied, tribes within the
English description.
{18}
The barbarians that Tacitus writes of lived to the south and east of
these, on the eastern side of the Rhine, but what he has to say about
them we may take to apply to those forefathers of our own, because,
just as the name English included Jutes and Saxons, so too the
English and many others, such as the Goths and the Franks, were all
to be included under a name of wider meaning still. All were
related. All spoke a language which had evidently come from the same
original source, though different tribes had learnt to speak rather
differently because they had lived far apart from each other for a
great many years. All had very similar customs and ways of life, and
the same religion. Christianity had not yet come to them.
[Sidenote: Tacitus on the Goths]
What Tacitus tells us is that all these allied nations were made up
of people living the life of farmers. They liked to live separately
from each other, in families apart. Their farm would consist of as
much plough land as the head of the family and his sons and daughters
could work and keep in good order, and as much pasture land as his
cattle required. These farmers would be established in the midst of
the great forests which covered all the land. They would be either
in natural glades in these forests or in clearances made by the
people themselves.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account