The Greville Memoirs, Part 3 (of 3), Volume 2 (of 2): A Journal of the Reign of Queen Victoria from 1852 to 1860Greville, Charles
History
The Greville Memoirs, Part 3 (of 3), Volume 2 (of 2): A Journal of the Reign of Queen Victoria from 1852 to 1860
Greville, Charles
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901
_February 15th._--While the world is waiting with tolerable patience
for the opening of the negotiations, it has got two subjects to
occupy and interest it, and to give rise to plenty of discussion and
dispute. The first is the Life Peerage question, which is become very
embarrassing to its opponents and its advocates. There is a great
majority of the lawyers against it, but more on the score of its being
improper and inexpedient, _perhaps_ unconstitutional, than that it is
absolutely illegal. The highest authority in favour of it seems to
be Dr. Lushington, who refused to be made a peer when a peerage was
pressed upon him. The Government are determined to fight it out, and on
no account to give way. Nobody knows with whom the project originated,
but there is a very general idea that it was with the Prince. General
Grey, however, told his brother, the Earl, that the Prince had nothing
to do with it, and that His Royal Highness knew nothing of the matter
till after it had been settled. I cannot see how it can be _illegal_,
and neither the danger nor the inexpediency of making Life Peers is
quite apparent to me; but I think it has been a blunder, and that so
great a novelty ought not to have been suddenly sprung upon the world
without any attempt to ascertain how it would be regarded, and Derby's
argument it is very difficult to meet. He says that when a certain
prerogative has not been exercised for 400 years, such long disuse of
it, if it does not amount to an abrogation of it, at all events throws
such a doubt upon it as to make the exercise of it now exceedingly
questionable, and it appears by the precedents that in every case of
a Life Peerage it was done _consensu procerum_, or _consensu procerum
et communitatis_, that is, by consent of the Lords, or by Act of
Parliament. The whole question is so obscure and uncertain, that it is
impossible to come to any satisfactory conclusion drawn from precedents
and usage. In spite of the resolution of the Government, I doubt
whether they will not be compelled to give way in some manner, for the
Opposition appear to be equally resolved not to let Baron Parke take
his seat.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account