The Grey Friars in OxfordLittle, A. G. (Andrew George)
History
The Grey Friars in Oxford
Little, A. G. (Andrew George)
Franciscans -- Great Britain
but the question no doubt refers merely to the gift of a few shillings,
which was usually made to each friar on his dismissal. No instance occurs
in the records of a pension having been paid to any of the Grey Friars who
were at Oxford at the time of the suppression[797]. It is probable that
Baskerfeld, who was an important person in the University, received a
benefice with license to live in Oxford. Robert Newman seems also to have
been presented to a living[798]. But the career of only one of these
eighteen friars can be traced with any certainty. Simon Ludford, a native
of Bedford, became an apothecary in London. On November 6, 1553, he
supplicated for the degree of M.B. at Oxford after six years’ study in the
medical faculty. On November 27, he obtained the degree and was admitted
to practise. The College of Physicians remonstrated with the University
and recommended that the degree should be revoked on the ground of
Ludford’s ignorance. Though the University refused to withdraw its
license, the ex-friar proceeded to Cambridge, but the Physicians hastened
to warn the authorities there against him. They had, they wrote to the
University, already examined Ludford ‘on the 17th day before the Calends
of March, 1553’ (?), and, finding him completely ignorant of medicine,
philosophy, and the liberal sciences, and distinguished only by ‘blind
audacity,’ unanimously voted against his admission. Ludford left
Cambridge, but persevered. In May 1560, he supplicated for the degree of
M.D. at Oxford, stating that he had long practised in London by permission
of the London College of Physicians. In July he incepted as M.D. of
Oxford. In April 1563 he was made fellow of the College of Physicians, and
he was censor of the same College in 1564, 1569, and 1572.[799]
We turn now to the Minorites who had studied at Oxford, but who were
living in other convents at the time of the dissolution. Of these a
considerable number obtained benefices[800], a few even rising to
positions of some importance in the Church[801]. But what proportion these
successful cases bore to the unsuccessful cannot be even approximately
ascertained; it would naturally be higher among friars who had received a
university education than among the common herd. Yet it is unlikely that a
majority even of the former were presented to livings. The number of
disbanded monks and friars seeking employment as priests must have been
very large, and at the same time the demand for priests was growing less
and less.[802] Some of the friars probably drifted into secular
employments; others perhaps joined the ranks of the ‘sturdy beggars’ of
whom so much is heard in the sixteenth century. It can hardly be doubted
but that the lot of many was one of hardship and suffering.
In the eyes of Cromwell and his royal master the only question of real
importance was the most advantageous disposal of the property. The
buildings of the Grey Friars were of little account, and the convent was
among those
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account