The Group Mind: A Sketch of the Principles of Collective Psychology: With Some Attempt to Apply Them to the Interpretation of National Life and CharacterMcDougall, William
Science
The Group Mind: A Sketch of the Principles of Collective Psychology: With Some Attempt to Apply Them to the Interpretation of National Life and Character
McDougall, William
Ethnopsychology; National characteristics; Social psychology
Europe on the other hand was fortunate in that all the different
peoples, or most of the peoples, from which its nations have been formed
were of allied race; they were all, with few exceptions, of the white
race, sufficiently nearly allied not to produce inferior cross-races but
rather to produce some superior subraces. The conquered peoples have
been so similar to their conquerors in physical type that crossing could
take place without the cross-bred offspring bearing the indelible marks
of inferior or mixed parentage, such as a dark skin or a woolly head.
Hence, although caste systems were formed, they did not prove rigid;
free intermarriage took place, and it was not impossible for individuals
of the conquered race or of the mixed stock to rise into the superior
ruling class. The importance of this may be seen, on reflecting how the
merest trace of negro-blood in individuals of mixed origin in North
America is apt to show itself in the physical features and how, even in
that enlightened and Christian country, a trace so revealed suffices to
condemn a man, no matter how great his powers or refined his character,
to remain a member of the inferior caste.
But, apart from the possible improvement of the racial qualities of the
whole people, or of the average individuals in general, which may well
have occurred in Europe, the biological blending of allied races may
give important advantages to the resulting people in another way—namely,
by increasing its variability, the variability of its mental qualities.
If a people is extremely homogeneous in the racial sense, it may be
expected to display little variability, its members will be of
essentially similar mental qualities and of a uniform level of mental
capacity; and this will tend to make them a very stable, but a very
conservative unprogressive, nation. This seems to be true of China, and
to be in large part the source of its extreme stability and extreme
conservatism.
Where, on the other hand, a people is formed by the intimate blending by
intermarriage of two or more racial stocks, it is likely to be a
variable one; there will be large departures in many directions from the
average type of mental ability, and there will be individuals varying by
excess of development of various capacities as well as others varying by
defect of development.
And a people of variable and therefore widely diversified mental
capacities will, even though its average capacity is no greater than
that of a more homogeneous people, be more likely to make progress in
civilisation, and this for three reasons.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
The Group Mind: A Sketch of the Principles of Collective Psychology: With Some Attempt to Apply Them to the Interpretation of National Life and Character — John Shaqi
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account