The Group Mind: A Sketch of the Principles of Collective Psychology: With Some Attempt to Apply Them to the Interpretation of National Life and Character — John Shaqi
The Group Mind: A Sketch of the Principles of Collective Psychology: With Some Attempt to Apply Them to the Interpretation of National Life and CharacterMcDougall, William
Science
The Group Mind: A Sketch of the Principles of Collective Psychology: With Some Attempt to Apply Them to the Interpretation of National Life and Character
McDougall, William
Ethnopsychology; National characteristics; Social psychology
It is a notorious fact that, when a number of men think and feel and act
together, the mental operations and the actions of each member of the
group are apt to be very different from those he would achieve if he
faced the situation as an isolated individual. Hence, though we may know
each member of a group so intimately that we can, with some confidence,
foretell his actions under given circumstances, we cannot foretell the
behaviour of the group from our knowledge of the individuals alone. If
we would understand and be able to predict the behaviour of the group,
we must study the way in which the mental processes of its members are
modified in virtue of their membership. That is to say, we must study
the interactions between the members of the group and also those between
the group as a whole and each member. We must examine also the forms of
group organisation and their influence upon the life of the group.
Groups differ greatly from one another in respect of the kind and degree
of organisation they possess. In the simplest case the group has no
organisation. In some cases the relations of the constituent individuals
to one another and to the whole group are not in any way determined or
fixed by previous events; such a group constitutes merely a mob. In
other groups the individuals have certain determinate relations to one
another which have arisen in one or more of three ways:
(1) Certain relations may have been established between the individuals,
before they came together to form a group; for example, a parish council
or a political meeting may be formed by persons belonging to various
definitely recognised classes, and their previously recognised relations
will continue to play a part in determining the collective
deliberations and actions of the group; they will constitute an
incipient organisation.
(2) If any group enjoys continuity of existence, certain more or less
constant relations, of subordination, deference, leadership and so
forth, will inevitably become established between the individuals of
which it is composed; and, of course, such relations will usually be
deliberately established and maintained by any group that is united by a
common purpose, in order that its efficiency may be promoted.
(3) The group may have a continued existence and a more or less
elaborate and definite organisation independently of the individuals of
which it is composed; in such a case the individuals may change while
the formal organisation of the group persists; each person who enters it
being received into some more or less well-defined and generally
recognised position within the group, which formal position determines
in great measure the nature of his relations to other members of the
group and to the group as a whole.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account