The Growth of the English Constitution from the Earliest Times — John Shaqi
The Growth of the English Constitution from the Earliest TimesFreeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
History
The Growth of the English Constitution from the Earliest Times
Freeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
Constitutional history -- Great Britain
I have said that the primæval Teutonic constitution was brought with
them by our Teutonic forefathers when they came as conquerors into the
Isle of Britain. I will not again go into the details of the English
Conquest, the settlement which gave us a new home in a new land, nor
into all the questions and controversies to which the details of the
English Conquest have given rise. I have spoken of them over and over
again with my voice and with my pen, and I hope I may now take for
granted what I have fully argued out elsewhere(26). I hope that I
may be allowed to assume the plain facts of the case, without going
through the details of every point. I will assume then—for it is that
to which the question really comes—that England is England and that
Englishmen are Englishmen. I will assume that we are not Romans or
Welshmen, but that we are the descendants of the Angles, Saxons, and
Jutes who came hither in the fifth and sixth centuries, of the Danes
and Northmen who came hither in the ninth. I will assume that we are
a people, not indeed of unmixed Teutonic blood—for no people in the
world is of absolutely unmixed blood—but a people whose blood is not
more mixed than that of any other nation; that Englishmen are as truly
Englishmen as Britons are Britons or as High-Germans are High-Germans.
I will assume that what is Teutonic in us is not merely one element
among others, but that it is the very life and essence of our national
being; that whatever else we may have in us, whatever we have drawn
from those whom we conquered or from those who conquered us, is no
coordinate element, but a mere infusion into our Teutonic essence;
in a word I will assume that Englishmen are Englishmen, that we are
ourselves and not some other people. I assume all this; if any man
disputes it, if any man chooses not to be an Englishman but to be a
Welshman or a Roman, I cannot argue with him now; I can only ask him to
turn to the arguments which I have urged on all those points in other
times and places. I assume that, as we have had one national name, one
national speech, from the beginning, we may be fairly held to have an
unbroken national being. And when we find a Teutonic-speaking people
in Britain living under the same political and social forms as the
Teutonic-speaking people of the mainland, it is surely no very rash or
far-fetched inference that the tongue and the laws which they have in
common are a common possession drawn from a common source; that the
island colony in short came itself, and brought its laws and language
with it, from the elder mother-land beyond the sea.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account