Jewish philosophy -- Early works to 1800; Judaism -- Works to 1900; Philosophy, Medieval -- Early works to 1800
lesson is also contained in the Talmudical passage, which begins, “He
who considers four things,” etc., and concludes, “He who does not
regard the honour of his Creator”; here also is given the advice which
we have already mentioned, viz., that man should not rashly engage in
speculation with false conceptions, and when he is in doubt about
anything, or unable to find a proof for the object of his inquiry, he
must not at once abandon, reject and deny it; he must modestly keep
back, and from regard to the honour of his Creator, hesitate [from
uttering an opinion] and pause. This has already been explained.
It was not the object of the Prophets and our Sages in these utterances
to close the gate of investigation entirely, and to prevent the mind
from comprehending what is within its reach, as is imagined by simple
and idle people, whom it suits better to put forth their ignorance and
incapacity as wisdom and perfection, and to regard the distinction and
wisdom of others as irreligion and imperfection, thus taking darkness
for light and light for darkness. The whole object of the Prophets and
the Sages was to declare that a limit is set to human reason where it
must halt. Do not criticise the words used in this chapter and in
others in reference to the mind, for we only intended to give some idea
of the subject in view, not to describe the essence of the intellect;
for other chapters have been dedicated to this subject.
CHAPTER XXXIII
You must know that it is very injurious to begin with this branch of
philosophy, viz., Metaphysics; or to explain [at first] the sense of
the similes occurring in prophecies, and interpret the metaphors which
are employed in historical accounts and which abound in the writings of
the Prophets. On the contrary, it is necessary to initiate the young
and to instruct the less intelligent according to their comprehension;
those who appear to be talented and to have capacity for the higher
method of study, i.e., that based on proof and on true logical
argument, should be gradually advanced towards perfection, either by
tuition or by self-instruction. He, however, who begins with
Metaphysics, will not only become confused in matters of religion, but
will fall into complete infidelity. I compare such a person to an
infant fed with wheaten bread, meat and wine; it will undoubtedly die,
not because such food is naturally unfit for the human body, but
because of the weakness of the child, who is unable to digest the food,
and cannot derive benefit from it. The same is the case with the true
principles of science. They were presented in enigmas, clad in riddles,
and taught by all wise men in the most mysterious way that could be
devised, not because they contain some secret evil, or are contrary to
the fundamental principles of the Law (as fools think who are only
philosophers in their own eyes), but because of the incapacity of man
to comprehend them at the beginning of his studies: only slight
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account