Jewish philosophy -- Early works to 1800; Judaism -- Works to 1900; Philosophy, Medieval -- Early works to 1800
allusions have been made to them to serve for the guidance of those who
are capable of understanding them. These sciences were, therefore,
called Mysteries (sodoth), and Secrets of the Law (sitre torah), as we
shall explain.
This also is the reason why “the Torah speaks the language of man,” as
we have explained, for it is the object of the Torah to serve as a
guide for the instruction of the young, of women, and of the common
people; and as all of them are incapable to comprehend the true sense
of the words, tradition was considered sufficient to convey all truths
which were to be established; and as regards ideals, only such remarks
were made as would lead towards a knowledge of their existence, though
not to a comprehension of their true essence. When a man attains to
perfection, and arrives at a knowledge of the “Secrets of the Law,”
either through the assistance of a teacher or by self-instruction,
being led by the understanding of one part to the study of the other,
he will belong to those who faithfully believe in the true principles,
either because of conclusive proof, where proof is possible, or by
forcible arguments, where argument is admissible; he will have a true
notion of those things which he previously received in similes and
metaphors, and he will fully understand their sense. We have frequently
mentioned in this treatise the principle of our Sages “not to discuss
the Maʻaseh Mercabah even in the presence of one pupil, except he be
wise and intelligent; and then only the headings of the chapters are to
be given to him.” We must, therefore, begin with teaching these
subjects according to the capacity of the pupil, and on two conditions,
first, that he be wise, i.e., that he should have successfully gone
through the preliminary studies, and secondly that he be intelligent,
talented, clear-headed, and of quick perception, that is, “have a mind
of his own” (mebin middaʻato), as our Sages termed it.
I will now proceed to explain the reasons why we should not instruct
the multitude in pure metaphysics, or begin with describing to them the
true essence of things, or with showing them that a thing must be as it
is, and cannot be otherwise. This will form the subject of the next
chapter; and I proceed to say—
CHAPTER XXXIV
There are five reasons why instruction should not begin with
Metaphysics, but should at first be restricted to pointing out what is
fitted for notice and what may be made manifest to the multitude.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account