Jewish philosophy -- Early works to 1800; Judaism -- Works to 1900; Philosophy, Medieval -- Early works to 1800
The infidels, however, though believing in the existence of the
Creator, attack the exclusive prerogative of God, namely, the service
and worship which was commanded, in order that the belief of the people
in His existence should be firmly established, in the words, “And you
shall serve the Lord,” etc. (Exod. xxiii. 25). By transferring that
prerogative to other beings, they cause the people, who only notice the
rites, without comprehending their meaning or the true character of the
being which is worshipped, to renounce their belief in the existence of
God. They were therefore punished with death; comp. “Thou shalt save
alive nothing that breatheth” (Deut. xx. 16). The object of this
commandment, as is distinctly stated, is to extirpate that false
opinion, in order that other men should not be corrupted by it any
more; in the words of the Bible “that they teach you not,” etc. (ib.
18). They are called “enemies,” “foes,” “adversaries”; by worshipping
idols they are said to provoke God to jealousy, anger, and wrath. How
great, then, must be the offence of him who has a wrong opinion of God
Himself, and believes Him to be different from what He truly is, i.e.,
assumes that He does not exist, that He consists of two elements, that
He is corporeal, that He is subject to external influence, or ascribes
to Him any defect whatever. Such a person is undoubtedly worse than he
who worships idols in the belief that they, as agents, can do good or
evil.
Therefore bear in mind that by the belief in the corporeality or in
anything connected with corporeality, you would provoke God to jealousy
and wrath, kindle His fire and anger, become His foe, His enemy, and
His adversary in a higher degree than by the worship of idols. If you
think that there is an excuse for those who believe in the corporeality
of God on the ground of their training, their ignorance or their
defective comprehension, you must make the same concession to the
worshippers of idols; their worship is due to ignorance, or to early
training, “they continue in the custom of their fathers.” (T. B.
Hullin, 13a) You will perhaps say that the literal interpretation of
the Bible causes men to fall into that doubt, but you must know that
idolaters were likewise brought to their belief by false imaginations
and ideas. There is no excuse whatever for those who, being unable to
think for themselves, do not accept [the doctrine of the incorporeality
of God] from the true philosophers. I do not consider those men as
infidels who are unable to prove the incorporeality, but I hold those
to be so who do not believe it, especially when they see that Onkelos
and Jonathan avoid [in reference to God] expressions implying
corporeality as much as possible. This is all I intended to say in this
chapter.
CHAPTER XXXVII
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account