Jewish philosophy -- Early works to 1800; Judaism -- Works to 1900; Philosophy, Medieval -- Early works to 1800
Before approaching the subject of this chapter, we will first consider
the words of Moses, “And they shall say unto me, What is His name? what
shall I say unto them?” (Exod. iii. 13). How far was this question,
anticipated by Moses, appropriate, and how far was he justified in
seeking to be prepared with the answer? Moses was correct in declaring,
“But, behold, they will not believe me, for they will say, The Lord
hath not appeared unto thee” (ib. iv. 1); for any man claiming the
authority of a prophet must expect to meet with such an objection so
long as he has not given a proof of his mission. Again, if the
question, as appears at first sight, referred only to the name, as a
mere utterance of the lips, the following dilemma would present itself:
either the Israelites knew the name, or they had never heard it; if the
name was known to them, they would perceive in it no argument in favour
of the mission of Moses, his knowledge and their knowledge of the
divine name being the same. If, on the other hand, they had never heard
it mentioned, and if the knowledge of it was to prove the mission of
Moses, what evidence would they have that this was really the name of
God? Moreover, after God had made known that name to Moses, and had
told him, “Go and gather the elders of Israel, ... and they shall
hearken to thy voice” (ib. xvi. 18), he replied, “Behold, they will not
believe me nor hearken unto my voice,” although God had told him, “And
they will hearken to thy voice”; whereupon God answered, “What is that
in thine hand?” and he said, “A rod” (ib. iv. 2). In order to obviate
this dilemma, you must understand what I am about to tell you. You know
how widespread were in those days the opinions of the Sabeans; all men,
except a few individuals, were idolaters, that is to say, they believed
in spirits, in man’s power to direct the influences of the heavenly
bodies, and in the effect of talismans. Any one who in those days laid
claim to authority, based it either, like Abraham, on the fact that, by
reasoning and by proof he had been convinced of the existence of a
Being who rules the whole Universe, or that some spiritual power was
conferred upon him by a star, by an angel, or by a similar agency; but
no one could establish his claim on prophecy, that is to say, on the
fact that God had spoken to him, or had entrusted a mission to him;
before the days of Moses no such assertion had ever been made. You must
not be misled by the statements that God spoke to the Patriarchs, or
that He had appeared to them. For you do not find any mention of a
prophecy which appealed to others, or which directed them. Abraham,
Isaac, or Jacob, or any other person before them did not tell the
people, “God said unto me, you shall do this thing, or you shall not do
that thing,” or “God has sent me to you.” Far from it! for God spoke to
them on nothing but of what especially concerned them, i.e., He
communicated to them things relating to their perfection, directed them
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account