Jewish philosophy -- Early works to 1800; Judaism -- Works to 1900; Philosophy, Medieval -- Early works to 1800
in what they should do, and foretold them what the condition of their
descendants would be; nothing beyond this. They guided their fellow-men
by means of argument and instruction, as is implied, according to the
interpretation generally received amongst us, in the words “and the
souls that they had gotten in Haran” (Gen. xii. 5). When God appeared
to our Teacher Moses, and commanded him to address the people and to
bring them the message, Moses replied that he might first be asked to
prove the existence of God in the Universe, and that only after doing
so he would be able to announce to them that God had sent him. For all
men, with few exceptions, were ignorant of the existence of God; their
highest thoughts did not extend beyond the heavenly sphere, its forms
or its influences. They could not yet emancipate themselves from
sensation, and had not yet attained to any intellectual perfection.
Then God taught Moses how to teach them, and how to establish amongst
them the belief in the existence of Himself, namely, by saying Ehyeh
asher Ehyeh, a name derived from the verb hayah in the sense of
“existing,” for the verb hayah denotes “to be,” and in Hebrew no
difference is made between the verbs “to be” and “to exist.” The
principal point in this phrase is that the same word which denotes
“existence,” is repeated as an attribute. The word asher, “that,”
corresponds to the Arabic illadi and illati, and is an incomplete noun
that must be completed by another noun; it may be considered as the
subject of the predicate which follows. The first noun which is to be
described is ehyeh; the second, by which the first is described, is
likewise ehyeh, the identical word, as if to show that the object which
is to be described and the attribute by which it is described are in
this case necessarily identical. This is, therefore, the expression of
the idea that God exists, but not in the ordinary sense of the term;
or, in other words, He is “the existing Being which is the existing
Being,” that is to say, the Being whose existence is absolute. The
proof which he was to give consisted in demonstrating that there is a
Being of absolute existence, that has never been and never will be
without existence. This I will clearly prove (II. Introd. Prop. 20 and
chap. i.).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account