Jewish philosophy -- Early works to 1800; Judaism -- Works to 1900; Philosophy, Medieval -- Early works to 1800
Abarbanel (Don Isaak) wrote a Commentary on I. i.–lv.; II. xxxi.–xlv.,
and a separate book Shamayim-ḥadashim, “New Heavens,” on II. xix., in
which he fully discusses the question concerning Creatio ex nihilo. The
opinion of Maimonides is not always accepted. Thus twenty-seven
objections are raised against his interpretation of the first chapter
of Ezekiel. These objections he wrote at Molin, in the house of R.
Abraham Treves Ẓarfati. The Commentary is followed by a short essay
(maamar) on the plan of the Moreh. The method adopted by Abarbanel in
all his Commentaries, is also employed in this essay. A series of
questions is put forth on the subject, and then the author sets about
to answer them. M. J. Landau edited the Commentary without text, with a
Preface, and with explanatory notes, called Moreh li-ẓeddakah (Prag.
1831; MS. Bodl. 2385). In addition to these the same author wrote
Teshubot “Answers” to several questions asked by Rabbi Shaul ha-Cohen
on topics discussed in the Moreh (Venice, 1754).
Abraham Abulafia wrote “Sodot ha-moreh,” or Sitre-torah, a kabbalistic
Commentary on the Moreh. He gives the expression, גן עדן (Paradise),
for the number (177) of the chapters of the Moreh. MS. Nat. Bibl. 226,
3. Leipsic Libr. 232, 4. MS. Bodl. 2360, 5, contains a portion of Part
III.
Buchner A. Ha-moreh li-ẓedaḳab (Warsaw, 1838). Commentary on “The
Reasons of the Laws,” Moreh III. xxix.–xlix. The Commentary is preceded
by an account of the life of Maimonides.
Comtino, Mordecai b. Eliezer, wrote a short commentary on the Moreh
(Dr. Ginsburg’s collection of MSS. No. 10). Narboni, who “spread light
on dark passages in the Guide,” is frequently quoted. Reference is also
made to his own commentary on Ibn Ezra’s Yesod-mora.
Crescas (Asher b. Abraham), expresses in the Preface to his Commentary
the conviction that he could not always comprehend the right sense of
the words of Maimonides, for “there is no searching to his
understanding.” He nevertheless thinks that his explanations will help
“the young” to study the Moreh with profit. A long poem in praise of
Maimonides and his work precedes the Preface. His notes are short and
clear, and in spite of his great respect of Maimonides, he now and then
criticises and corrects him.
David Yaḥya is named by Joseph Del Medigo (Miktab-aḥuz ed. A. Geiger,
Berlin, 1840; p. 18, and note 76), as having written a Commentary on
the Moreh.
David ben Yehudah Leon Rabbino wrote ʻEn ha-ḳore, MS. Bodl. 1263. He
quotes in his Commentary among others ʻArama’s ʻAkedat yiẓḥaḳ. The
Preface is written by Immanuel ben Raphael Ibn Meir, after the death of
the author.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account