Jewish philosophy -- Early works to 1800; Judaism -- Works to 1900; Philosophy, Medieval -- Early works to 1800
of fire or air, although the spheres would not move round a stable
point. But I will show that the amount of excentricity has, in a
certain way, been described in the Almagest; and later scholars have
calculated the exact amount of excentricity in terms of radii of the
earth, and have proved the result. The same measure has been used in
astronomy in describing all distances and magnitudes. It has thus been
shown that the point round which the sun moves lies undoubtedly beyond
the sphere of the moon, and below the superficies of the sphere of
Mercury. The centre for the circuit of Mars, that is, the centre of the
excentric sphere of Mars, is beyond the sphere of Mercury, and below
the sphere of Venus. The centre of Jupiter has the same distance; it
lies between the sphere of Venus and that of Mercury, whilst the centre
of Saturn lies between the spheres of Mars and Jupiter. Now, consider
how improbable all this appears according to the laws of Natural
Science. You will find it out when you consider the known distances and
magnitudes of each sphere and each star, all expressed in terms of the
radii of the earth. There is a uniform measure for all, and the
excentricity of each sphere is not determined by units proportionate to
its own magnitude.
It is still more improbable and more objectionable to assume that there
are two spheres, the one within the other; that these are closely
joined from all sides, and have, nevertheless, different centres. For
in this case the smaller sphere might move whilst the larger be at
rest; but the smaller cannot be at rest when the larger moves, and must
move with the larger when the latter rotates round any other axis than
that which passes through the two centres. Now we have this proposition
which can be proved; and, further, the established theory that there is
no vacuum, and also the assumed excentricity of the spheres; from all
this it follows that in every two spheres the motion of the upper one
should cause the lower sphere to move in the same way, and round the
same centre. But this is not the case; the outer and the inner spheres
do not move in the same way, and not round the same centre or the same
axis; each of them has its peculiar motion. For this reason it has been
assumed that between every two spheres there are substances different
from those of the spheres. It may be very much doubted whether this is
the case; for where should the centres of these intermediate substances
be placed? have these substances likewise their own peculiar motion?
Thabith has explained the above-mentioned theory in one of his
treatises, and proved that we must assume a substance of a spherical
form intermediate between one sphere and the other. All this is part of
that which I have not explained to you when you studied with me, for I
was afraid you might become confused and would not understand even
those things which I wished to show you. But as to the inclination and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account